Is it time for a new Scope?

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

SPDCHK

Member
I loaded the following code in my 12F675 PIC and tested it with my Kenwood Oscilloscope. The results was not what I expected. I then loaded the file into my simulator (Proteus) and there the results came out as what I expected.

Now the question is: Do I need a new scope? Which of these two pieces of test equipment should I trust? I'd rather believe the scope vs. computer simulated software.

Can someone with a newer scope perhaps test the code?

Thanks.

 

Attachments

  • ScopeDiff.jpg
    190.8 KB · Views: 337
Last edited:
have you tried the scope with other known sources to eliminate the possibility that it is showing you what is really occurring?
 
I would sooner believe the scope, rather than what is essentially a computer game - and only has a passing resemblance to real life.
 
Have you correctly adjusted the scope's probe?

Test your scope with its internal calibration signal and with an external source.

Looking at your first picture though, it seems to be working.
 
SPDCHK said:
Now the question is: Do I need a new scope? Which of these two pieces of test equipment should I trust? I'd rather believe the scope vs. computer simulated software.

Can someone with a newer scope perhaps test the code?
Thanks.
Click to expand...

Hi SPD,
I like simulators and I believe they have a place in testing BUT I would trust real hardware over a simulation.

I prefer 'raw' data over processed data anytime.
 
Hero999 said:
Have you correctly adjusted the scope's probe?

Test your scope with its internal calibration signal and with an external source.

Looking at your first picture though, it seems to be working.
Click to expand...

Yes, I tested both channels to the internal calibration signal. Even to 50Hz.

I've written the code such that It should be on/off with 100us intervals, but from the scope indication, the periods are no where near the same ???
 
The scope looks like it is probably working fine. I am assuming the display is stable as pictured indicating no triggering / holdoff problems.

I can't think of any failure mode of an analog scope that would muck with timing between pulses... well, not without distorting the display but that isn't happening.

You must be a software guy if you're blaming the hardware. J/K

Good luck in troubleshooting!

Michael
 

Yes, I suppose I can be called a software guy, but in this case I'd rather believe the hardware. It just seems odd that the On/Off periods don't display the same on the scope.
 
That is weird...

But if the trace is stable on the scope, then WYSIWYG I am pretty sure.

The scope has a timing circuit that controls the horizontal sweep. If there is a problem with it, the trace will look funny (varying intensity across the sweep). If there is a problem with triggering or holdoff I would think it'd affect all signals in funny ways.

So... maybe it is some weird timing issue with the interrupts... or maybe the MCU isn't configured the way it needs to be (ie, the way the simulation assumes it is) ... ??

Michael
 
Your scope probe appears to be under-compensated, but other than that, the waveform looks to be a proper display of what the circuit is doing.
 

FEEDBACK

I added to my code a start pulse of 50µs and assigned the output to one of the unused I/O pins. I connected the scope’s external trigger probe to this I/O pin, and continued using the channel A probe to measure the databus, and voila, my old scope is still as good as the day I bought it.

Thanks for all the help you guys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Question
Is it possible to use IC 555 for all MOSFET switches of power supply?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Papabravo
D
  • Question
A solenid latch to contract and release a door after a set amount of time, that is being pulled by a spring to open it.
2
Replies
26
Views
3K
danadak
  • Question
Is it possible to make a gate level digital wrist watch
2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
Fluffyboii
  • Question
What is floating ground , and why it needs insulation ?
Replies
3
Views
911
crutschow
  • Question
Using PIC16F1939 and designing a circuit around it.
Replies
9
Views
1K
Fluffyboii
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…