tonyp12 said:Do I already have a working prototype?, how do I know all this stuff?
hmmm.........
If you did why would you be asking here?.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tonyp12 said:Do I already have a working prototype?, how do I know all this stuff?
hmmm.........
tonyp12 said:Just playing with you geeks.
I'm not an engineer or even work in the electronic industry.
But that makes me to look outside the box and that's when
the magic happens.
I have contacted a company that do a product close to this idea
and see if they want to run with it.
tonyp12 said:Your PIC fan so you like tiny and cheap CPUs.
But it think it would choke in trying to move 100MB/sec of data.
It will use DMA and with a very simple Blitter function.
Exactly.Nigel Goodwin said:You've already answered your own question PER USER, two users using the same program would need to pay twice - or the relative amounts based on a multi-user licence.
tonyp12 said:Not necessary, take windows XP for instance
have you notice that you can set up different username log-ins.
MS does not charge extra that 4 different people can use
the same Windows and Office at different times.
If you now switch these users 30/second, you are all using
the program one at time but it's seamless for the users.
MS licencing typically excludes any form of multiplexing and thus licences would be required for each user.Hero999 said:Exactly.
Even though you can have several users logged on, it doesn't mean they're actually using the operating system at the same time. This is only possible by using several monitors, keyboards, and mouses in which case each user would require a separate licence.
I think this is stupid, whatever happend to fair use?
Providing you're not using the software commercially you should be able to install it on as many machines as you like providing it's only for personal use.