Google this for more info.
Obviously (at least if you know me) I am against this. The right to your beliefs does not mean the right to be ignorant or intolerant of others. You also shouldn't be afraid of defending them. And if you choose to reject something, you should do so being fully informed rather than soley from misconceptions taught by someone else who has already rejected that something.
But in the papers, etc, I can reading articles that support my position that referring to articles that do not, but I never seem to see those articles. Obviously, the mentioned articles are of the intolerant kind that others would be embarrassed to be associated with. But there are usually somewhat valid arguments from both sides. I just can't seem to find them...
So if someone could post their pro-44 opinion or where I could read some, that'd be nice.
EDIT: Well...I've found some pro-editorials. But they are all scary and disturbing. I need some valid ones to mull over.
Obviously (at least if you know me) I am against this. The right to your beliefs does not mean the right to be ignorant or intolerant of others. You also shouldn't be afraid of defending them. And if you choose to reject something, you should do so being fully informed rather than soley from misconceptions taught by someone else who has already rejected that something.
But in the papers, etc, I can reading articles that support my position that referring to articles that do not, but I never seem to see those articles. Obviously, the mentioned articles are of the intolerant kind that others would be embarrassed to be associated with. But there are usually somewhat valid arguments from both sides. I just can't seem to find them...
So if someone could post their pro-44 opinion or where I could read some, that'd be nice.
EDIT: Well...I've found some pro-editorials. But they are all scary and disturbing. I need some valid ones to mull over.
Last edited:
