This is quite strange, but I actually accessed my parallel port on windows xp without relying on any external dll!? It works just fine. Is there a contradiction somewhere...?
If it would be informative, I'm using Turbo C.
This is quite strange, but I actually accessed my parallel port on windows xp without relying on any external dll!? It works just fine. Is there a contradiction somewhere...?
If it would be informative, I'm using Turbo C.
As you are obviously aware, Windows NT (which XP basically is!) won't allow direct access - HOWEVER you can get programs which install on your PC that will allow it, I'm not talking a DLL that your program uses (like WinPicProg uses), but a transparent program installed seperately.
Presumably you have such a program installed?, possibly something that required it did the installation and you don't even know?.
As you are obviously aware, Windows NT (which XP basically is!) won't allow direct access - HOWEVER you can get programs which install on your PC that will allow it, I'm not talking a DLL that your program uses (like WinPicProg uses), but a transparent program installed seperately.
Presumably you have such a program installed?, possibly something that required it did the installation and you don't even know?.
I can assure you, as someone who supports a program that has to access the ports (WinPicProg) that all NT Windows versions don't allow it - WinPicprog had to be re-written to use a DLL for NT (way back before XP).