" Just center it vertically in the middle of the robot so it is symmetrical upside down and right side up." what does it mean? am unable to imagine..
When I said separate motors I mean separate motors to spin the main track and the arm track. There is a always a separate motor to rotate the arm." I dont think it's of same motors as 1 ctrl is for wheel rotation and the other for support arm's angle movement..
BTW 3.5kg force and am using 21cm wheel and torque is 38kg which am using
I remember u said abt idealr wheels, what if i drive them them also by 20 rpm 4 kgcm torque motor.. would it help me drive the track?
Yeah, you want to use sprockets to drive the belt because of slippage. It also makes it so you dont need to tension the belt as much, otherwise the belt will have to be very tight. A wide belt with more contact area might help not slip if the belt is tight. But it doesnt help if the belt is loose and part of the belt will always be loose.Hmm ok i now understand the theory part of it, when width inc. force is distributed
But am not in a idea of using a sprocket till now.. Am using just wheels and belt, i was suggested to use sprocket since there would be slippage between the wheel's gripped OD and smooth inner side of the belt.. If this is the case should the belt be wider? so that it can gain more contact surface with the wheel ?
I thought if idler wheels are driven by a motor it will also add some pulling force in belt.. seems am wrong its k
Am switching to this design only because gears at required sizes are not readily available in my locality..
Other than the 360 degree rotation constraint, are there any other issues in this design
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?