Welcome to ETO, jiggawatts.
Not sure what you're designing, but could you provide a complete schematic of your proposed circuit?
I will try to research this more unless you can get me started on something on this. Just need a switching circuit as described. I'm currently just trying out the resistance wire designs and testing them.
Not to rain on your idea, but a 30 MHz, 1% duty cycle, 1.2 kW pulse circuit is squarely in the range of satellite radio, a few decades away from
Not exactly that much is required. The main idea is to be within a radio frequency range that is absorbed by metal especially tin foil, and to have as much separation in the two frequencies as possible, to give as much separation and thus amplitude bias as possible.
A 330 ps pulse would be difficult to produce (and test!) at 1 milliwatt, let alone at over a million times higher power. Moving tens of amperes around in less than a billionth of a second is very difficult and even more expensive.
It doesn't need to be perfectly balanced A.C. I think, just enough to create a strong jerk in the electrons. Though making it too weak and too small of a current may make the amplitude more balanced rather than biased.
NASA took a multi-million-dollar swing at this with zero result. And once you get a working (!) circuit, and test it, and build a cavity with dimensions accurate to less than 1/1000 of an inch, and it works (!!!), how will you measure one nanonewton (nN) of force?
I'm not making a cavity thruster, trying my own design. First of all I just need to verify that it produces an amplitude plateau increase or decrease when turned on, using an oscilloscope, some kind of a multimeter, or spectrum analyser / bandwidth analyser. If we're talking milli-Newtons of thrust focused on one place, using 1.2kW, we should be able to see it directed at a flake of tin foil.
Separate from that, here is something to consider. The reason everyone went nuts over Einstein's theories is that even though they contradicted "common sense" at relativistic velocities, they reduced to Newton's mechanics at normal velocities. The genius and beauty of Einstein's work is that it extended, ***but did not contradict*** centuries of known fact and hard science. Reactionless thrust violates this in all four quadrants defined by open and closed systems, and Newtonian and quantum mechanics.
As you can see in this c++ app here
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2Wuir9-DSiURFJ2SDdqclNsXzQ/view?usp=drivesdk
When you get to "t7" the "ge" gravitational energy and "ke" kinetic energy are greater than the values at "t0", so in what sense are they conserved, along with electric energy, if they are potentially unlimited, or how can you say how much potential energy there is without knowing the future trajectory.
It makes perfect sense if you think of the resonant thruster as using these trajectories to throw energy against a "sail". And it is my understanding that braking deceleration or any kind of deceleration is the cause of radiation
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremsstrahlung , and so you can have any amount of radiation just by running a current through a wire of different materials and compositions, with resistance, and current, voltage, etc.
I think the gravitational and electric forces themselves may be conserved by Le Sage's mechanism as ordinary electromagnetic radiation.
I have some of my own theory you can read on
https://polyfrag.livejournal.com and
https://twitter.com/neurohash . I have some physics video on relativity theory and these experiments at at
https://experiment.com/projects/xyzqnmkbtxfjlkaplvum .