ComeonMaudeRejectionRatio
New Member
Hello everyone. I have a 500W power supply and my son says he poked the power supply's fan terminal with a screwdriver and the breaker popped while the power supply failed.
Now I am really confused about one thing: When I traced the voltages from the diode bridge ford ( whose 1 diode also failed, replaced and then failed again with another breaker pop which was expected because one kf13n50 MOSFET and 5R06X diode were also initially failed), the positive 300V (220*sqrt(2)) terminal goes to the heatsink plate where the MOSFETs lie on the front of the board. It seems certain that this is deliberate (look at the pads on backside --first image) Who would design in such a way? Why is there an exposed bare 300V aluminum plate- invitation for disaster-? A real WTF moment for me. Next RT11 carries this voltage to the big chunky-boi Capacitor (400V 270uF) which is also okay. RT11 is a PTC thermistor to double the foolproofness. RT11 is normally short and when I heated it up its resistance increased to a few ohms.
PS: All desoldered till the short on the Live-Neutral is removed. I note here that one of the MOSFETs failed during the incident (one of kf13n50's) - its drain and source was shorted- gate to source had 30ohms. The other 2 kf13n50s are okay. I also note here that the 5R06X rectifier diode also failed as it remained short in both directions.
- By tracing I mean tracing it with a multimeter not just visually.
-The kf13n50's (13n50) are "no top terminal" packaged so maybe the reason that plate had to be at 300V would have been the drain contact of the transistor had to be there at 300V? So they had to accommodate for that? back: front:
BACKSIDE: (where most of the circuit is)
FRONTSIDE (component names)
Since this is well isolated I strongly believe that the failed components are on the floating voltages side not on the other sides of the transformers (e.g. 12V 5V or 3.3V output sides etc.). ( The transformers also looked okay while I am not sure because I read short since this supply is 80+ and needs to be highly efficient so inductor windings on the transformers are thick and very low resistance)
Thank you so much Tony Stewart Nigel Goodwin
References:
Diodes:
1N5408: https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/149/1N5408-888344.pdf
uf5408 (last column) : https://www.vishay.com/docs/88756/uf5400.pdf
: 5R06x : https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/stth5r06.pdf
Transistor:
KF13N50: https://www.docdroid.net/e8APRLd/kf13n50-pdf
Now I am really confused about one thing: When I traced the voltages from the diode bridge ford ( whose 1 diode also failed, replaced and then failed again with another breaker pop which was expected because one kf13n50 MOSFET and 5R06X diode were also initially failed), the positive 300V (220*sqrt(2)) terminal goes to the heatsink plate where the MOSFETs lie on the front of the board. It seems certain that this is deliberate (look at the pads on backside --first image) Who would design in such a way? Why is there an exposed bare 300V aluminum plate- invitation for disaster-? A real WTF moment for me. Next RT11 carries this voltage to the big chunky-boi Capacitor (400V 270uF) which is also okay. RT11 is a PTC thermistor to double the foolproofness. RT11 is normally short and when I heated it up its resistance increased to a few ohms.
PS: All desoldered till the short on the Live-Neutral is removed. I note here that one of the MOSFETs failed during the incident (one of kf13n50's) - its drain and source was shorted- gate to source had 30ohms. The other 2 kf13n50s are okay. I also note here that the 5R06X rectifier diode also failed as it remained short in both directions.
- By tracing I mean tracing it with a multimeter not just visually.
-The kf13n50's (13n50) are "no top terminal" packaged so maybe the reason that plate had to be at 300V would have been the drain contact of the transistor had to be there at 300V? So they had to accommodate for that? back: front:
BACKSIDE: (where most of the circuit is)
FRONTSIDE (component names)
Since this is well isolated I strongly believe that the failed components are on the floating voltages side not on the other sides of the transformers (e.g. 12V 5V or 3.3V output sides etc.). ( The transformers also looked okay while I am not sure because I read short since this supply is 80+ and needs to be highly efficient so inductor windings on the transformers are thick and very low resistance)
Thank you so much Tony Stewart Nigel Goodwin
References:
Diodes:
1N5408: https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/149/1N5408-888344.pdf
uf5408 (last column) : https://www.vishay.com/docs/88756/uf5400.pdf
: 5R06x : https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/stth5r06.pdf
Transistor:
KF13N50: https://www.docdroid.net/e8APRLd/kf13n50-pdf
Last edited: