RC time formula

Status
Not open for further replies.

mozikluv

New Member
hi,

i have read articles about computing time,

one says T1 = 0.67 (Ra + Rb) C F = 1.49/(Ra + 2Rb) C

the other says T1 + 0.693 (Ra + Rb) C F=1.44/(Ra+2Rb)C

in computation the time difference is very small, but which one is the correct formula.

T = 1.0986RaC others they just round it to 1.1. where or how this constant figure was derived?

T = 0.693 (Ra + Rb) C, where or how this 0.693 was derived?

thanx
 
I asked a similar question over on Google awhile back, this is what i got.

For the monostable:

2/3 = 1-e ^(-t/RC)
-1/3 = -e ^(-t/RC)
1/3 = e ^( -t/RC)
ln(1/3) = -t/RC
(Use your scientific calculator to find the natural logrythm (ln or e^x) of 1/3)
-1.0986123 = -t/RC
t= 1.0986123 RC
Rounding off gives: 1.1RC

For the astable:

Charging: t1 = -ln(1/2)(Ra+Rb)C
(natural log of 1/2=-0.69314718)
= 0.693(Ra+Rb)C

Discharging: t2 = -ln(1/2)(Rb)C
= .693(Rb)C

Total period T = t1+t2
 
The forumlae are of 555 astable and monostable multivibrator.

For astable
Ton = 0.693*(Ra+Rb)*C
Toff = 0.693*Rb*C
Duty cycle = Ton / (Ton + Toff) = (Ra+Rb)/(Ra+2Rb)
Frequrnct = 1 / (Ton + Toff)

For monostable
Ton = 1.1*R*C
 
time formula

hi,

thanx to nettron1000, k7elp60, & kinjalp.

have been using these formulas but had never known where where the 1.0986 and 0.693 came from. again thanx
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…