Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
akg said:
PDubya said:Agreed, Tom's used to be very unbiased and was a great resource, but it didn't take long before he (they) were bought off. A lot of reviews are clearly regurgitated marketing material, and are commonly paged to double-digit levels for no obvious reason (other than to increase advert exposure).
To back up Overclocked, I am also a fan of AMD. Their newest dual-core CPU's are my current recommendation to folks, and I have one in my development machine - as I would never recommend something I didn't own or use myself.
So, like OC noted, keep your eyes open and read around - you will be surprised at the varying "results" different sites will have. The personal experience of someone you know that has hands on experience will be more valuable than 100 internet reviews.
ParkingLotLust said:Just wait until the Core Duo 2 is released. All you AMD fanboys will be left wimpering behind your FX-62's.
ParkingLotLust said:Haha, right now AMD is king, but Intel will be when they release their new proc, then AMD will be back up and the cycle just repeats, theres never an overall winner for more than a year or so
audioguru said:My Intel Overdrive 486-100 was very quick when running Win3.1, slower when running Win98. It had cache from a Pentium in it.
My Pentium4-2.93GHz is pretty quick but not extremely fast when running WinXP-Home.
I agree with you 100%!<sarcasim>I think no matter what proc your using, windows will always be slow
Marks256 said:I agree with you 100%!
The thing i hate most about intel processers, is they have so much speed, but such a small cache, that the speed isn't shown! I got a 2.6ghz Intel Celeron for free(from the trash, seriously), and it only had a 128l2 cache! I would expect something like; 256, or 512 would be nice. Or 1mb. But no; 128! That sucks! Amd is all speed and chache(along with alot of style!)
Marks256 said:I agree with you 100%!
The thing i hate most about intel processers, is they have so much speed, but such a small cache, that the speed isn't shown! I got a 2.6ghz Intel Celeron for free(from the trash, seriously), and it only had a 128l2 cache! I would expect something like; 256, or 512 would be nice. Or 1mb. But no; 128! That sucks! Amd is all speed and chache(along with alot of style!)
ParkingLotLust said:If youre looking for top-notch video and image editing, and the like, go with an Intel. If youre looking for gaming, then go with an AMD. Also, if you have a bigger budget, go with an Intel. Ive owned some older AMD chips and had nothing but problems. Just personal opinion tho.