Ron H said:
e-l-e-c-t-r-o said:
All I was qurious was whether with the circuit you suggested, we have an output level that does not relate to the level of the input maximum point.
Cause if the capacitor is charging as long as the input remains constant (i.e for eternity) at its higher value, then the capacitor will continue to charge (not forever, until it reaches the converter's limits).
This is bad, right?
It's not bad - or good. A current source charging a capacitor is not a useful circuit unless it gets discharged sometime, for some reason.
I don't think the slew rate limiter is what my tutor is asking, although I think that clamp generator perform a such a role, right?
What
is your tutor asking?
Please answer this.
The clamp will cause the cap charging to stop at the control voltage level, but the slope of the output will be a function of the control voltage. That's not the way a slew rate limiter works.
I got it about the inability to discharge.I am curious to whether this ability could be added.
Can u suggest a theory frame for what I am curious to as if it could be built?
You can simply discharge the cap with a switch to GND (or some other voltage, and with or without a series resistor). The switch can be an NPN, a MOSFET, a JFET, etc. You could get more elaborate and discharge it through a current sink, constant or programmable. There obviously has to be some event to trigger this, be it an external event or an output from a comparator.
All I suggested is a way to "force" the capacitor to charge up to the point of the initial input's maximum voltage.
I just think that a clpam generator should have this feature.
:roll:
clpam? I'm assuming this is means "clamp". The "clamp" generator is just the last block diagram I posted. The controlled current source is not part of a clamp generator.
I see no point in stopping the ramp when it reaches the control voltage. Why does this seem so important to you? Suppose the control voltage was 0 to 100 volts (which we could easily do). What do you do now?
If you are looking to make this do something useful, you could make a voltage-controlled oscillator by connecting this circuit (possibly with some modifications) to a 555 timer chip or some other sort of Schmitt trigger.
"What is your tutor asking? Please answer this."
Let's see:
Tutor's assignment (this were my notes from the class):
"Find in the Internet a common voltage to current converter like the XTR 110.
Read about its operation and potential roles it has.
Take extra care in analyzing its operation in peak indicators and (linear) Digital to analog converters.
To give u a hint, look for circuits where a capacitor is forced to charge linear over time.(maybe in the exams-Linear DACs)
After you do that, search for a non-conventional VCc.
For instance, something not working in the normal 4-20mV range, or not being part of a current loop.
Then analyze its operation and role.
Then compare and contrast these different kind of VCcs; how successfull are in what they do, how frequent you can see them in applications etc.
The whole point of the exercise is to get into practical details and potential problems that these circuits might face.
To know them inside out.(Focus into linear capacitor charging!)
So, you'd better dig into some potential problems and see what's going on there.
(Extra marks for those providing solutions!).
Applications relative to the exercise: Clamp generators, voltage controlled oscilators etc."
Does this answer something?
"It's not bad - or good. A current source charging a capacitor is not a useful circuit unless it gets discharged sometime, for some reason. "
It is bad when it is useless, I meant.So my question on how to discharge the capacitor needed an answer for a reason.Good.
"The clamp will cause the cap charging to stop at the control voltage level, but the slope of the output will be a function of the control voltage. That's not the way a slew rate limiter works."
That's fine with me, and one of the reasons I said my tutor is not asking for a slew rate limiter.We agree, I guess.
"You can simply discharge the cap with a switch to GND (or some other voltage, and with or without a series resistor). The switch can be an NPN, a MOSFET, a JFET, etc. You could get more elaborate and discharge it through a current sink, constant or programmable. There obviously has to be some event to trigger this, be it an external event or an output from a comparator.
If you are looking to make this do something useful, you could make a voltage-controlled oscillator by connecting this circuit (possibly with some modifications) to a 555 timer chip or some other sort of Schmitt trigger."
I did a little search one that, found a link:
**broken link removed**
in page 5 paragraph 3, it says something like the one I am asking, right?
If that's it, could you suggest possible refinements for me?At least we could discuss about it.
I think with all that I shall be getting an "A" in the exercise!Thanks :shock:
This circuit in the pdf relates to a VCO producing a "sawtooth" waveform.
The thing is that the input is a variable voltage level (used to control the pitch), and that variability has to be included into the sawtooth waveform as well.
SOO, the max voltage level of input is a VITAL info in that application, right?
A general schematic for my application could be like that, right?
Or maybe it needs too much refinement?
Last but not least, what is with the "integrator"?What exactly does he mean?I am a little lost on that one
Thank you all for your help, by the way. :!: