Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Transistor Ignition shematic

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hate to bring up an old thread. But what size capacitor is used on the circuit simmilar to the ATOM module. I know it is .47, but .47 uF, pF, F?
Thanks a bunch.
 
0.47 µF, probably 400V to 600V or so. Need to see the actual design to be sure about the voltage rating.

John
 
Last edited:
Thanks. That's what I needed to know. I am intending on using this on an old McCulloch go-kart engine because the atoms are no longer available.
 
need help also

dear debe did you change the value of R2 or is it the same value as the original atom im needing to build one of these for a '63 johnson outboard in witch the points and coils sit under the flywheel and i was wondering if you had ore pics of the layout of the ciruit because im not that good at reading schematics lol il admit im a newbie lol
 
dear debe did you change the value of R2 or is it the same value as the original atom im needing to build one of these for a '63 johnson outboard in witch the points and coils sit under the flywheel and i was wondering if you had ore pics of the layout of the ciruit because im not that good at reading schematics lol il admit im a newbie and thanks in advance
 
here is the pic
 

Attachments

  • ign.PNG
    ign.PNG
    60.6 KB · Views: 873
Bringing up the old thread, but....

When contact points are closed Transistor Q1 is closed i.e. not conducting. When contact points open Q1 is conducting and the coil is energized. Why the operation is inverted?, normal CDI ignition system energizes the coil when points are closed and when points open the spark is created.

James
 
Bringing up the old thread, but....

When contact points are closed Transistor Q1 is closed i.e. not conducting. When contact points open Q1 is conducting and the coil is energized. Why the operation is inverted?, normal CDI ignition system energizes the coil when points are closed and when points open the spark is created.

James
Hi MJ,

With traditional Kettering ignition systems, the points are closed and current ramps up in the primary winding of the ignition coil, to typically 4A maximum.

At the ignition point, the points open and the coil generates a back emf, of typically 400V, which is transformed to between 15KV to 33KV across the secondary winding of the coil.

On the other hand, with a CDI (capacitor discharge ignition) system an inverter converts the normal battery voltage (12V) to 100V to 400V to charge a capacitor, typically 1uF to 4.7uF, to 100V to 400V.

At the ignition point the charged capacitor is connected to the primary winding of the coil, by a bipolar junction transistor (BJT), insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT), MOSFET, or SCR. This generates a fast, high energy, pulse across the primary of the ignition coil, which is transformed to 15KV to 33KV across the secondary winding of the coil.

So the functioning of a Kettering ignition system and a CD ignition system are quite different and a CDI system can be arranged to trigger from a positive or negative pulse.

spec
 
Last edited:
Welcome.
Thinking about it, if you inverted the point operation on a engine if you then adjusted the timing the igntion system would still work, however the dwell time would be all messed up.
The op mentions a hall sensor so maybe his 'cam', the device that triggers the hall sensor is custom made, or the system charges the coil at a variable dwell time.
 
With CDI there is no dwell as such.

With a Kettering ignition the the dwell is crucially important, because during the dwell period the coil current is ramping up and if the dwell is not sufficient the current build-up will not be enough to generate a healthy spark. One of the shortcomings of the Kettering system is that as the engine revs increase, by definition, the dwell reduces, thus the spark energy also reduces, just when you need a good spark (at high revs).

On the other hand, with CDI, the high voltage generator can run all the time, and the high voltage generator can be made as powerful as you like, so it can be made to charge up the CDI capacitor as fast as you like.

spec
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top