Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What if the sled was propelled using electro magnetic induction rather than steam pistons? Newer carriers are all designed with reactors capable of making the needed power.
They seem to have settled on the linear induction motor but the rail gun concept was also played around with in several ways. Yes, the focus on the Gerald Ford class and newer was larger reactors. Make more electricity was what was part of future plan. Also carriers like the Nimitz class were good for about 20 years before refueling while we were shooting for 40 years on the newer boats including the single reactor subs. The carriers have two.
Ron
Your neighbors down the road were key players in this, those guys around Pittsburgh. Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory is a key player in the game. Worked quite a bit with those guys as well as KAPL (Knolls in NY) and Oak Ridge in Tenn. The first nuclear carrier was the Enterprise CVN 65 and it was really an oddball even the original island structure but it was powered by eight small A2W (The A1W was the first prototype and never saw a ship) reactor plants similar to those used in the subs at the time. Then came CV66 and CV67 the Kennedy and America which were planned nuclear but with congress upset they ended up conventional. Then came the USS Nimitz the first of the super carrier Nimitz class and powered by two A4W (A = Aircraft Carrier 4 being the 4th generation of the reactor and W being Westinghouse the guys ultimately providing and delivering the end product.that sounds just like a government design. The Wikipedia article says the carrier has a 50-year designed lifetime - and now you say 20-years between refueling. Do they have to be topped off or can they ask for just a half-tank
Only issue may be that there may be a lot of EMP or RF interference with the avionics in the plane. Imaging launching the plane with a rail gun but all the electronics inside the plane crash or get fried...I want one of those, no I need one of those.
Actually the same concept has been tossed around for the catapults on aircraft carriers. Think about it and how much fresh water is wasted for those steam cat shots. What if the sled was propelled using electro magnetic induction rather than steam pistons? Newer carriers are all designed with reactors capable of making the needed power.
Ron
OK, with the issue of a huge magnetic pulse. They were last I knew looking at forms of linear induction motors. My best guess since I only heard chatter and was not involved with anything launch system related would be shielding since everything which makes the sled go is below the steel flight deck. The only reason I had heard anything remotely associated with it was because the new reactor designs called for more power generating capability. Things like how much EMP could kill avionics never crossed my mind or methods to contain it also never crossed my mind. Headaches were distributed equally.Only issue may be that there may be a lot of EMP or RF interference with the avionics in the plane. Imaging launching the plane with a rail gun but all the electronics inside the plane crash or get fried...
OK, with the issue of a huge magnetic pulse. They were last I knew looking at forms of linear induction motors. My best guess since I only heard chatter and was not involved with anything launch system related would be shielding since everything which makes the sled go is below the steel flight deck. The only reason I had heard anything remotely associated with it was because the new reactor designs called for more power generating capability. Things like how much EMP could kill avionics never crossed my mind or methods to contain it also never crossed my mind. Headaches were distributed equally.
You are right Beau. I just did not read all the posts before replying. I read down to about #4 and thought of the EMP issue. No intent to step on toes here.sagor1 - That's esssentially what I said in Post #6
Yes, interesting. Daughter born in North Carolina, US and son born in Naples, Italy.It sounds like you've had an interesting life though Ron
Yes, interesting. Daughter born in North Carolina, US and son born in Naples, Italy.
Again though anything EMP was far from my areas the actual rail gun (back on topic) uses no shortage of electronics and seems to do just fine.
While Michael has a US passport he could bring all his birth certificate documents to the Italian Consulate in NY or Chicago and apply for and obtain an Italian passport. When he was a kid I would tell him he faced conscription into the Italian Army.