Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Proximity effect and losses in an SMPS Flyback transformer?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Flyback

Well-Known Member
Hello,
The following is a 150W offline Flyback ( abbreviated schem attached) with an output of 300V.
The three secondaries would each be spread across their own layer layer in the transformer. The three secondaries would be interleaved between the two primary halves to reduce leakage inductance.
-So, Given that the transformer has five layers of coils, to what degree do you believe that “Proximity Loss” would reduce the efficiency?

(it’s a constant off time flyback and switching frequency is around, but not exactly 90kHz.)
 

Attachments

  • Schem _Brief Flyback 300V 150W for efficiency test.pdf
    148.8 KB · Views: 144
Until you actually build a transformer there is no way of knowing.
There are too many variables in building a transformer. example " The three secondaries would each be spread across their own layer layer in the transformer." There are many different ways of doing that.
two primary halves to reduce leakage inductance.
p-------
s-------
s-------
s-------
p-------
Think about the p to s capacitance.
p------
p------
Now think about the p to p capacitance. Hard to know but probably there is not a great difference.
In example 1 there are many layers of insulation between P-S while in example 2 there could be less layers so more capacitance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top