SimonTHK
Member
So this is just a minor quistion
Would it ever be preferable to have stereo instead of mono for outdoor use? (in my situation, will come back to that).
I mean, stereo is probably made for a setup where the user are placed between the loudspeakers (besides or in front of the user), so that the sound can have a depth and be "moved around" in any position between the two loudspeakers.
But in my situation (used for an outdoor event with background music) people are moving around the loudspeakers, placing themselfes sometimes to the right of both loudspeakers or left of them both.
So why not just play mono?
Lets imagine the user are placed 10 meters from left loudpseaker and 15 from the right one. This will still provide some depth in the music, but the depth would be wrong.... So what would be preferable?
Would it ever be preferable to have stereo instead of mono for outdoor use? (in my situation, will come back to that).
I mean, stereo is probably made for a setup where the user are placed between the loudspeakers (besides or in front of the user), so that the sound can have a depth and be "moved around" in any position between the two loudspeakers.
But in my situation (used for an outdoor event with background music) people are moving around the loudspeakers, placing themselfes sometimes to the right of both loudspeakers or left of them both.
So why not just play mono?
Lets imagine the user are placed 10 meters from left loudpseaker and 15 from the right one. This will still provide some depth in the music, but the depth would be wrong.... So what would be preferable?
Last edited: