I have to say I'm enjoying the conversation.
I do recognized these methods wouldn't be conventional for a fully modern house, but they are options for off grid living. I could be overestimating some but I don't think my ideas are massively unrealistic.
I acknowledge these methods aren't 'free' but a different form of cost, and consequence.
That's a nifty gadget and a great conversation starter, but nothing more. If you're a total noob and interested in learning electronics then that would be a cool beginner project.
That is exactly what I am.
But it's important that you realize the physics behind it and why it will never power anything practically; The weights must be lifted up before they can generate any power. It takes more energy to lift the weights than what you get out of the light.
It would not be total energy independence but I think there is merit for applications if hybrid with solar/wind. A large consideration I think is it depends on the context and perspective of the situation. For example here it is a novelty, but in rural African villages it is a way to light up a school.
You would need to invest in materials heavily but there are generators that run on the weight platforms you park your car on.
Enhance the process and it becomes more functional. For example some designs use liquid filled containers as the weight. They utilize a pump to transfer the liquid to another container, self reseting. If you had a top and bottom catch tank and solar/wind powered pumps to move the water you would have a steady system (admittedly not perpetual motion though) Hiccups, complications, and costs associated but possible and potential for refining.
As an example a 'night light' for a chicken coup. Water would be pumped and stored through the day, then released (triggered by a light sensor? controlled valves and pumps) to work the machine through the night. A battery would be easier and cheaper probably but I find the renewable aspect appealing.
The reason why there's no woodgas pump at the gas station is that the process of converting trees to engine fuel costs way more than people are willing to pay.
The difficulty of storing woodgas is the major hurdle for this. From what I've researched it's more practical to make it in real time. Admittedly this still comes with labor in working the gasifier, maintaining/cleaning the engine, a more involved fuel system and so on. Not free but the cost changes from cash at the pump to labor on the machine, which for some is fun.
Ethanol cannot compete with gasoline without the help of free money from the government.
I would say that hinges on the context of 'At this time, given the current technology of ethanol production and sheer quantity of oil available for processing.' I don't think Ethanol will be the answer; I do think it has potential to improve; and hope that it plays a part in the development of other options.