Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Is this really a resistor?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Scarr

Member
Hi all,

Is this pic of a resistor? I have seen them before but never understood with the different case etc.

It has a RED band near one end and 2 x black in middle

Thanks

Steve
 

Attachments

  • Whatisthis.jpg
    Whatisthis.jpg
    140.6 KB · Views: 227
Last edited:
That's defenetly a resistor (it's marked on the board with R1)

It's a SMD version (surface mount device)

Robert-Jan
 
Hi all,

Is this pic of a resistor? I have seen them before but never understood with the different case etc.

It has a RED band near one end and 2 x black in middle

Thanks

Steve

Yes, it is an SMD resistor. Try searching Google for 'minimelf resistors'.
The colour bands are just the same as for through-hole resistors.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is an SMD resistor. Try searching Google for 'minimelf resistors'.
The colour bands are just the same as for through-hole resistors.

I agree, it looks like a resistor in a melf package.
 
I agree, it looks like a resistor in a melf package.
...

seldom to see the value printed using colour bands. That one has a resistance of 270,000Ω or 270KΩ. The black markings are just spacings between value numbers.
 
...

seldom to see the value printed using colour bands. That one has a resistance of 270,000Ω or 270KΩ. The black markings are just spacings between value numbers.

I agree. I have also seen pico fuses with color bands.

Scarr,

Have you ohmed it out to see what the resistance is?
 
Why a mini-melf

First thanks for clarifying what it is, but why use a mini-melf what on same board they use 0805? it measures 269R (not 270k) I have read that some mini melfs are very high precision could this be why it's used?

thx
 
First thanks for clarifying what it is, but why use a mini-melf what on same board they use 0805? it measures 269R (not 270k) I have read that some mini melfs are very high precision could this be why it's used?

thx

0805 resistors can dissipate less heat. Check the power ratings on some datasheets.
 
Don't think it's power

I don't think it's power, this is a RS232 two wire (Tx+RX) to 1 wire circuit so there is no real power going through it (or am I wrong!), I have managed to create a schematic for this circuit as I also wanted to know if it's possible to stop the TX comming back down the RX line by somehow chopping the line somewhere around point with red circle around it.

My thinking is that every time a TX pulse is sent use this to disable the RX line, any ideas anyone?


P.S. you can see
 

Attachments

  • RX_TX.jpg
    RX_TX.jpg
    100.2 KB · Views: 152
Power considerations would be the only reasons I would choose a mini melf resistor instead of a 0805 resistor there. R1 biases the 5.1V zener diode; depending on the value of Vcc, there could be a few milliamperes flowing through R1, hence the need of a higher power rating. Do you know that value?
On a side note, 0805 reistors are usually very precise (a tolerance of 0.1% is common). But that's not a requirement for R1.
 
Last edited:
...

seldom to see the value printed using colour bands. That one has a resistance of 270,000Ω or 270KΩ. The black markings are just spacings between value numbers.

I opened up a fairly new switch-mode power supply. There's color coded melf resistors all over it.
 
Power considerations would be the only reasons I would choose a mini melf resistor instead of a 0805 resistor there. R1 biases the 5.1V zener diode; depending on the value of Vcc, there could be a few milliamperes flowing through R1, hence the need of a higher power rating. Do you know that value?
On a side note, 0805 reistors are usually very precise (a tolerance of 0.1% is common). But that's not a requirement for R1.

Not necessarily. The precision of the resistor has nothing to do with it's size, as you well know. Most 0805 resistors have typical tolerances that you would see with their carbon-film axial leaded cousins. The most common tolerance for resistors is 5%. This holds true for SMD resistors as well.
 
True, but 1% metal films are about as good as you can commonly get cheaply in an axial package. In a chip package, you can get .5% about as cheap. Chips go even more precise (.1%, .05%, .02%), way more precise than the common axials, but it gets progressively more expensive. By the time you get to .02% they're horribly expensive.

FWIW, Yageo 1% axial metal films and Susumu 0.5% 0805 thin film chips are what I keep in my stock bins.

SMT capacitors is where we can really talk about both price and performance benefits over their leaded brethren, but that is for another thread :)
 
Last edited:
It's 12v +-5%

Thx

I get 176.3mW. 0805 resistors are rated for 1/8th (125mW). So that may be why they went with a melf here. But the next size up, 1206, is rated at 3/4W. So they could have easly have used this with no real estate constraints. It would cost less as well.
 
True, but 1% metal films are about as good as you can commonly get cheaply in an axial package. In a chip package, you can get .5% about as cheap. Chips go even more precise (.1%, .05%, .02%), way more precise than the common axials, but it gets progressively more expensive. By the time you get to .02% they're horribly expensive.

FWIW, Yageo 1% axial metal films and Susumu 0.5% 0805 thin film chips are what I keep in my stock bins.

SMT capacitors is where we can really talk about both price and performance benefits over their leaded brethren, but that is for another thread :)

I agree. But my point was the lower precision resistors are more common in the industry.
 
The precision of the resistor has nothing to do with it's size, as you well know.
That's correct, of course. I was exactly pointing out that 0805 resistors can be as precise as mini-melf resistors - regardless of the size, as you say - in response to this question:
Scarr said:
I have read that some mini melfs are very high precision could this be why it's used?
So, precision was not the reason to choose a mini-melf resistor for R1; instead, that choice was caused by power dissipation as I supposed and as it's demonstrated by your calculations. A 1206 resistor rated for 0.75W would have been just fine.




P.S.: from my experience, the most common tolerance for 0805 resistors is 1% in the industry.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top