Wow! I just want to say Thank You for great constructive criticism, everyone's imput is well appreciated.
I tryed making the pads larger but they made the traces ( I thought ) to close.
I noticed the double trace, it didn't look like it needed to be there, but I wasn't sure. It was done by the Autorouter. It will be removed.
I have alot of expensive programs each with their good points and bad points. One of the main problem I was having making up a schematic is finding the right IC's and connectors (not to mention the right size footprints for the pcb side of it. Also when setting up a dual op amp in the schematic, in every program they transfer to the pcb board as two seperate IC chips. I asked in another post about how to fix this with no luck so I opted to just start over using Sprint and making just the PCB layout. Also there are alot of add on's that are going to be soldered to the edges of the board using wires. Linear switch, 3mm and 2mm phone jacks, some led's, etc.... (I just used LED leads to put in their place becuase they were small and I could use them as connecting points)This made it difficult for the expensive programs (with my knowledge of how they work ) almost impossible to to test for inconsistancy's in the circuit to be able to transfer over to the pcb layout with the right nets, rubberbands, ground, etc...
I used the autorouter on the traces except for a few that I didn't like where it put them. Is there a way to set the autorouter so that the traces go to the center of the pads and also a setting to make 45* corners. I know that when I did the manual traces it automatically made the 45* angle? ( as mentioned up above I'm using Sprint)
Thanks for letting me know about the lettering...I used it so that I could take a picture and save it for later uses, I will delete the lettering before I print out the circuit. Not sure what 'restring' is ,and yes I had the grid on. The autorouter put 99% of all the traces even the double trace. I will move all the traces to the center of the pads, np.
I will use inches if available....I thought it best to use mm since most of the datasheets and programs use that measurment.
Thanks Again!
Mark