thanks, yes you are absolutely right, yes
And of course I am sure you would agree that because that kind of additional testing is needed, there's just no point in doing it the way that the first post describes.....instead , just do it ChrisP58's (post #36) way or the other way involving the high side current monitor.-Then avoid the necessity for the additional testing that you describe.
And of course I am sure you would agree that because that kind of additional testing is needed, there's just no point in doing it the way that the first post describes.....instead , just do it ChrisP58's (post #36) way or the other way involving the high side current monitor.-Then avoid the necessity for the additional testing that you describe.