Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Worth calibrating a multimeter?

Status
Not open for further replies.
While this thread dates back well over 3 years it does bring up some interesting points as to calibrate or not calibrate test, measurement and diagnostic equipment as used for home and hobby purposes. Personally for home and hobby use I see no need for a calibration effort. However, since I am afforded the luxury I will on occasion bring equipment to work to check its uncertainty against lab standards. Overall though as to home use, I see no need for it.

Just My Take
Ron
 
As I've often said - 'calibration' isn't about how accurate or not the meter might be, it's just about having a piece of paper specifying it for a 'paper trail', for companies trying to comply with 'paper trail standards' :D

I can't even remember what the standards number is now?, but certainly all the companies I've dealt with that comply to it lowered both their performance and quality by complying.
 
Calibration is the act of adjusting or checking an instrument against a known standard that is more accurate than the instrument being adjusted/checked. Certification is the paperwork trail created by the line of traceable standards used to calibrated the standards being used to calibrate the instrument under test. Calibration is nice to do every once in a while for hobby purposes just to make sure that your instrument in question is still working OK. Sometimes, if we depend upon a certain instrument exclusively, we can end up not noticing that something's not right and will go nuts trying to make simple adjustments using an instrument that is horribly out of cal. For calibration labs and instrument manufacturers (e.g, Tektronix, Agilent, Gould, etc.), certification (traceablity) is an absolute must, especially if you're dealing with companies aligning to ISO or other standards. Calibration/certification with before-and-after test data is a RPIA for any technician doing the work. There's really no sense in a paper trail of statistical data just to look at the trends on an instrument. Who cares? If it's bad, fix it, don't write a history report!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top