Oh I am quite aware.With people like this it is pointless using logical reasoning. I just gave up after a few posts. There is a quote I saw somewhere "Don't confuse the argument with facts" That fits this situation perfectly.
Same old empty talk all of you types have. You got nothing to show and we both know it.open minded and closed minded. Only the former can lead to new discoveries and technological developments. I know which one I am and it's seems increasingly evident which one you are.
Yes, most here are open minded and considerate plus quite willing to listen to anyone who is willing to actually explainsomethig when asked to do so no matter how basic or complex it is which pretty much make the lack of your ability to give proof of your claims your fault and not ours. We are listening so get to talking and showing us where we are factually wrong in our views!While I'm sure most of the members here are well meaning, capable, educated and considerate people, those with your attitude and approach are exactly why new energy developments are not yet mainstream.
And yet you seem impossiblly unable to produce any such scientific data that anyone can confirm. How is that my or anyone everyone else's fault?Whereas I am following the full and time honoured scientific method of practical experimentation, gathering data, (in this case based on nearly 60 years of research and patents by others), repeating and validating such data and then contributing to the theoretical framework,
What attitude? The one of being skeptical because you type can never and have never once produced a single shred of workable proof of your claims to anyone anywhere? How is that the fault of the recipient and not the source?those with your attitude and approach are exactly why new energy developments are not yet mainstream. On a global scale its called 'Fear' and 'Vested Interest'.
Yes and you have quite solidly proven that when confronted with those who want to learn from you you cant produce squat while also feeling its their fault you can't. You have no clue who knows what or does or does not have the capacity to understand anything you may say yet proclaim you do and to such a level you cant be bothered to show your work while at the same time obviously can be bothered to argue out pointless excuses for your not producing anything that is remotely useful in supporting any of your claims.There are two types of sceptics in this world; open minded and closed minded. Only the former can lead to new discoveries and technological developments. I know which one I am and it's seems increasingly evident which one you are.
What makes you think that I and many other here don't already own and have read a libraries of such data and have not spent countless hours just trying to make any of it work only to find every given design is utter crap and that every person like you who comes along is as equally useless in showing us what we are supposedly missing as the one who came before you and the one before them and so on?I also think that if you were genuinely interested in testing new ideas in this area you would get the blueprints and information yourself for they are freely available with only a little digging and make your own investigations.
And you don't have to change anyone's minds. Just one will do, so get to doing it by answering our technical queries in fair response to our answering yours and the rest will follow! You came here ask a simple set of questions and get answers that are easy knowledge for us to understand so why do we not get the return of that from you?I did not come on here with a mission to change anyones mind for there aren't enough hours in the day and its not my role to short circuit the process of you discovering what is real or unreal in this universe and what does or does not work. I came on with a simple technical query.
But I and we did! several of us asked for proof and you promptly dropped the ball and wen onto blaming our knowledge base you know nothing about for it. That seems pretty arrogantly shallow and dang near petty stupid from our views.If on the other hand you had said "well what sort of information do you have that makes you think it worth spending time, money and effort exploring this type of generator and electronics" then I might well have shared all sorts of published docs.
But you are the one who refuses to give up any info on you proclaimed concepts. We aren't. Nobody attacked you, unless you think that being asked questions so that we can better understand what you are doing is an attack. Which if so, then why the hell did you come here and attack all of us with your questions? Did you think that if you attacked us nobody here would reciprocate that back to you?However, I am not a scapegoat for your sentiments about new ideas and I'm not going to share anything with someone who thinks it's ok to attack me for getting on with my own personal projects and enquiries. Who would!
Then you clearly have no clue what the real scientific process is and how it works to prove what is real and what is not. Independent third party confirmation of your process of discovery is exactly what the scientific process is about. It's not about everyone else proving your idea and concept is real. Its about you proving it to everyone else to where they can dissect and then replicate it and confirm your discovery.The best person to test an interesting idea is the person asking the question and not some third party. We all take on faith the findings of others in most areas of our lives but there are some areas where, for a host of reasons, it is appropriate to find out for ourselves. That's what I'm doing and it should have no impact whatsoever on you and your journey.
Yea, run away and hide. We all knew it was going to end this way. It always does without exception, as if it was some sort of unbreakable scientific law behind OU/PM discussions.So you stay safe with the 'a priori' views of your secret 'Mythbusters' group, or whatever it thinks of itself as, for you are obviously well matched. Bon voyage!
Pretty much everyone's is in that same boat and even if any joint group work did produce such a device we all know somebody in that group would leak the findings out to the world for either huge personal gains or honest betterment of society which pretty much say that all claimed designs that are obviously not in the real world doing what they are claimed to do are that way because they don't work.as an engineer, i would love to solve the world's energy needs in as simple and inexpensive a way as possible, because the consequences of not doing so, would be a return to slave labor. i would be the last one to suppress any technology that solves the world's energy needs.