Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or TL594 is the same.Look at TL494.
So not a PWM power supply IC but a oscillator. Voltage in and duty cycle out.All I want to do is put a voltage level in and get PWM out - not a power supply or anything.
Here is a option. LTSpice model.All I want to do is put a voltage level in and get PWM out - not a power supply or anything.
I've posted the original of that circuit several times, and have always been told it is no good. Although the original doesn't use the L298 (another part that everyone claims to stay away from). https://www.wzmicro.com/3525.htmHere's another way to do it: https://www.beta-estore.com/download/rk/RK-10149_127.pdf
View attachment 88610
John
I've posted the original of that circuit several times, and have always been told it is no good. Although the original doesn't use the L298 (another part that everyone claims to stay away from). https://www.wzmicro.com/3525.htm
But I have used the wzmicro circuit several times and can't see a reason that it's so 'bad'.
I don't think either is problematic myself. Though without the diode or'd outputs you will only get ~49% duty cycle, or no duty cycle if both outputs are used, due to the totem pole drivers on the output.What???? The circuit to which you link has the outputs OR'd (See KISS, #12). The circuit I linked to does not. Which circuit, in your opinion, is problematic?
John