Well that's not true, water's lowest resonance is around 28GHz (I can't recall the exact figure) which is a lot higher than you can produce using conventional components like transistors, capacitors and resistors.Kirkg said:Most research indicates that the most efficient electrolysis happens at the resonance frequency of water, which is reported at approximately 42KHz.
Originally Posted by Kirkg
Most research indicates that the most efficient electrolysis happens at the resonance frequency of water, which is reported at approximately 42KHz.
**********************************************
HarveyH42, Well that's not true, water's lowest resonance is around 28GHz (I can't recall the exact figure) which is a lot higher than you can produce using conventional components like transistors, capacitors and resistors
Well that's not true, water's lowest resonance is around 28GHz (I can't recall the exact figure) which is a lot higher than you can produce using conventional components like transistors, capacitors and resistors.
Kirkg said:Thanks for the input. Yes, most interesting the resonance of molecules. I was thinking on a more mundane level. People are getting very efficient electrolysis by pulsing DC in a cell. The observed frequency of high production seems to be about 42KHz with a perfect square wave. With or without inductors, and a LRC resonance circuit, I don't know. I would sincerely like help testing different circuits, and have a budget with which to do it. I would like to hook up with a super Geek who would find this fun. Isn't a pulsing DC circuit with MOSFETs and about 12V and 200 amp maximum within the realm of possibility? The water is positively fed through the cell so it won't heat.
skeeterb said:I myself post on https://www.overunity.com. I have attached a circuit diagram of an improved version of the circuit supposedly designed by Stanley Meyer. It pulses the the power input at different rates using a 555 timer IC. Different settings like Frequency and Mark/Space are changable by 10K Pots. I'm not sure of the portion of the circuit on the left of the circuit. It is another part of the settings, I guess. But see what you think and try it.
skeeterb said:I myself post on https://www.overunity.com. I'm not sure of the portion of the circuit on the left of the circuit. It is another part of the settings, I guess. But see what you think and try it.
Kirkg said:Chemelec; I forgot to address your statement. A resonant circuit is in an LRC configuration, I get that. But for the best pulse frequency of water we are agreed that we are in unknown territory. So....without an inductor can the circuit force a pulse frequency on the cell? I don't know, and believe me, I am humble because if it doesn't take nuts and bolts to hold it together, I am a newbie.
Glyph Just a quick question: what's the efficiency when you run electrolysis with straight DC current and what is the improvement when you run it on pulse?.
Kirkg said:Glyph; the reported efficiency of straight DC electrolysis, 1.4 V is reported to be about 62% best case. Stan Meyer, Andrija Puharich, and others have reported over 100% efficency. Puharich paid a lot of money to get his method certified by a reputable lab. For Chemelec; 10 gallons per minute water flow in a boat is a piece of cake, in a stationary generator likewise. In a car, no way. My cell, with good 316ss, spaced at .022", and properly sand-blasted pulls 30amps 12V with plain tap water. Throw out the modern stuff, use an old car (with a newly rebuilt engine), and get the Hydroxy to it, then restrict the petroleum, and see how far you can go on a gallon of gas. There are a lot of products on the market.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?