at first your intension is to safe a persons life by invading his responsability of his choice
the second thing is that you want to do it in a way wich is not safer than where you wan't to protect the person for and as a side effect it has the chance of endangering other peoples life with all consequences that can evolve from that
these 2 things have nothing to do that the way you wan't to realize this is I think technical not posible
and if you find a way to do it than it's nothing in the way of not using it which put yourself to the starting point of your quest
in my opinion that's wasted time efford and money
in case of wearing a helmet on the motor bike it's clearly the responsability of the driver
you can stimulate the driver by putting penaltys on him if he don't comply with it but if he/she doesn't see the importance for wearing a helmet than there will be always a situation that he will drive unprotected
technicaly you can't protect somebody from stupidity if you alow him/her the control of a vehicel
the only thing you can do is educate and hope that he/she see the importance of it for him/her and other road users
you have cars and motor bikes that are detuned (because they are considered to powerfull if your not a race pilot) this is in my opinion already a measure that goes to far
but geus what you have people that can "chip" the car/motor back to original performance specs
every system that people try to put up in the caller for safety can be bypased
some easy some harder but it's posibble
the thing is what if people rely on a safety device and it fails (and you design aproache was quite sensetive for failing)
if that has the consequense that means that other persons have a higher risk on injury/death than i would realy think about the ethics of having 1 person that deliberly schoose of having that risk or potential several persons looking at to the same faith but not ask for it
think about that i would say
Robert-Jan
the second thing is that you want to do it in a way wich is not safer than where you wan't to protect the person for and as a side effect it has the chance of endangering other peoples life with all consequences that can evolve from that
these 2 things have nothing to do that the way you wan't to realize this is I think technical not posible
and if you find a way to do it than it's nothing in the way of not using it which put yourself to the starting point of your quest
in my opinion that's wasted time efford and money
in case of wearing a helmet on the motor bike it's clearly the responsability of the driver
you can stimulate the driver by putting penaltys on him if he don't comply with it but if he/she doesn't see the importance for wearing a helmet than there will be always a situation that he will drive unprotected
technicaly you can't protect somebody from stupidity if you alow him/her the control of a vehicel
the only thing you can do is educate and hope that he/she see the importance of it for him/her and other road users
you have cars and motor bikes that are detuned (because they are considered to powerfull if your not a race pilot) this is in my opinion already a measure that goes to far
but geus what you have people that can "chip" the car/motor back to original performance specs
every system that people try to put up in the caller for safety can be bypased
some easy some harder but it's posibble
the thing is what if people rely on a safety device and it fails (and you design aproache was quite sensetive for failing)
if that has the consequense that means that other persons have a higher risk on injury/death than i would realy think about the ethics of having 1 person that deliberly schoose of having that risk or potential several persons looking at to the same faith but not ask for it
think about that i would say
Robert-Jan