Yes, but the jpg title includes '311' and the title of the post includes 'comparator'. So the schematic probably won't work as the OP intends. The OP needs to remove the ambiguity.
Yes, but the jpg title includes '311' and the title of the post includes 'comparator'. So the schematic probably won't work as the OP intends. The OP needs to remove the ambiguity.
It doesn't. As I said, the jpgtitle includes LM311 (just hover the mouse over the thumbnail to display the title). The OP apparently thinks the schematic relates to a comparator whereas, as you rightly pointed out, a 331 is a V2F. Could just be a typo (311 <> 331) ?
It doesn't. As I said, the jpgtitle includes LM311 (just hover the mouse over the thumbnail to display the title). The OP apparently thinks the schematic relates to a comparator whereas, as you rightly pointed out, a 331 is a V2F. Could just be a typo (311 <> 331) ?
I thought we could provide more relevant help if the OP could confirm whether they were really asking about a comparator or V2F.
But as the OP has apparently lost interest it's a moot point and no longer important.
The datasheet for the LM331 explains in some detail the internal workings of the chip. It should be possible to replicate that, at least approximately, as a subcircuit using the standard LTSpice components. In other words, make your own 'model'.
The datasheet for the LM331 explains in some detail the internal workings of the chip. It should be possible to replicate that, at least approximately, as a subcircuit using the standard LTSpice components. In other words, make your own 'model'.
alec,
This is the other thread, a behavioural circuit posted that would help him test the remainder of his circuit, which I keep asking him to post, without success.