Isn't that called semantics? I thought you were implying that no logic transformation (encoding, decoding, transmogrification, whatever) was required to get from binary to BCD.
no i didnt say that. i said
BCD is binary coded decimal. so BCD is actually an encoded form of binary. u cant decode binary to bcd. although u can decode bcd to binary.
when u transform one thing into something else, it is called encoding and when u transform it back to that thing it is called decoding. so when u transform binary into BCD, u r encoding binary into BCD. so BCD is an encoded form of binary. now when u transform BCD to binary u are decoding BCD to get the equivalent binary. the person who asked the question wrote "binary to BCD decoder" in the subject. so i told him that he was not right.
i think we should not argue on semantics and rather try to answer his question.
i told that im sorry i dont understand the question. but i did try to answer the question from what i understood.