My sentiments exactly...... Tread carefully!!!My view is that humans will get along much better with each other when they all manage to grow up and abandon organised religion in all its forms.
I have another view, this thread could be skating on thin ice.
JimB
I have no worries - I'm on thick ice.My view is that humans will get along much better with each other when they all manage to grow up and abandon organised religion in all its forms.
I have another view, this thread could be skating on thin ice.
JimB
What do you mean, "Tread carefully!!!"?My sentiments exactly...... Tread carefully!!!
God Almighty, His Majesty on High. And His son Jesus Christ of Nazareth.Who's God?
Nobody is forcing them to read the article. If they think it will upset them, they should simply not click onto it.There is many people within the confines of planet earth... The majority do not see things the way you do..
All I'm saying is this topic will be a complete mess unless I keep an eye on it.... As soon as it starts to upset ANY member.... snip...
Well then delete their comments. But I'm not going to play their game. You won't see those kind of comments from me. And I'm not going to argue. If they ask me a question then I'll answer it.I agree!! But they will read and they will comment!! I've seen threads become nasty... Some people do not want a debate... They'll just put you down!!!
... So myself being a Christian, I have no problem with the Big Bang Theory. I just believe that The Word of God made it happen when He spoke the universe into existence.
So what do you think about this?...
Hi cowboybob,Irrespective of one's faith (or lack thereof), I feel that the scientific pursuit of a definitive explanation (or any aspect, for that matter) of the origin of the Universe is the pursuit of the starting point of a circle.
So, if nothing else, where's the harm in assigning that origin as one's sees fit? I can, for instance, select any point on a circle and declare that "The is the start of the circle.": Who could prove me wrong?
A perfectly reasonable effort.rc3po said:... I don't want to deviate from the main purpose of this thread, which is to extinguish the argument that science & religion are always at odds with each other
I also find myself, at times, frustrated with what I consider to be the specious argument that science and religion cannot coexist.
How do you see creationism?
Me too. Equal chance of being correct.I point out to him that his faith (i.e., there is no God) is no more provable than my belief that there is.
Hello, I'm sure most people know by now that the Holy Bible was translated into English, and other languages, from mostly Hebrew(Aramaic) & Greek. In the King James version, Genesis 1: 1 begins, "In the beginning God created...". When you do a word study you find out that the word that was translated, "In", is actually #1722 meaning "golden", from the root word #2091 meaning "to shimmer golden", in the Strong's Concordance.
So actually Gen. 1: 1 should read, " In the shimmering golden beginning God created...".
Sounds like a Big Bang to me...
Why would the translators overlook this fact? Maybe they didn't understand what God meant.
So myself being a Christian, I have no problem with the Big Bang Theory. I just believe that The Word of God made it happen when He spoke the universe into existence.
So what do you think about this?
Thanks for your time.
Hello. I'm new to this forum. I came here because the last forum I was at is ran by atheists, as most seem to be, and it's my understanding of your rules that here it is ok to mention Biblical Text if you are actually making a legitimate point. Ironically, the point I was making was actually using The Holy Bible to give credence for the Big Bang Theory on their Physics Forum!
God Almighty, His Majesty on High. And His son Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?