i dont see anything wrong with starting a new post
No one said there's anything wrong with starting a new post. What Pommie said is that perhaps you should take the time to read and reply to help you receive on your existing threads rather than continually making more and not acknowledging help when you receive it.
More than half the total posts you have made have been the start of new threads, which means you have started at least 100 threads which you haven't bothered to reply to. Given the amount of time many members will have spent answering your queries and having their answers ignored, I think there
is something wrong with that.
Not only that, but it indicates that in the 6 years you have been a member of these forums, and the 543 posts you have made, you haven't even attempted to contribute anything to others' queries. Forums are for the free exchange of ideas, advice, etc., not to ask hundreds of questions, ignore the answers, and not share anything with those who have helped you so consistently in the past.
I also would have thought that after posting 321 threads, you would have gained the skills necessary to pick a suitable title for the thread and ask questions which aren't too vague to answer.
Pommie said:
BTW, anyone interested can check out the statistic by clicking on the Top Posters list on the main page and select "Top thread starters". Unbelievable!!
Hadn't noticed the top thread starters section before. I am, however, the proud OP of the fifth longest thread ever, and the title starts with "Basic problem"