Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

What resolution are you using?

What resolution are you using?

  • 640x480

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 600x600

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1024x768

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1280x1024

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1600x1200

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1024x576

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1280x720

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1366x768

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1680x1050

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • ≥1920

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.
1152 X 864

19" old style LCD screen (Dell)

Since my answer wasn't on the poll I didn't bother.
 
Voted >= 1920...

Running a dual-head 22" LCD setup, each at 1680x1050 (not sure if that counts as >= 1920, but that's what I put!)...
 
I'm using 800 x 600 @ 32bit color on a Sceptre 4:3 LCD panel. Having had cataract surgery on both eyes it's a good compromise between fitting things on the screen and being able to read it.
 
I may be wrong on this note but isn't it true of flat panel monitors (the non CRT flavors) that they are designed and built to run at a specific resolution?

Currently my everyday system happens to have a 23" HP S2331 monitor. I have that resolution set at 1920 X 1080 because that is the native resolution for this particular monitor. My workstation system uses a pair of Samsung 915n 19" monitors and those are set for 1280 X 1024 resolution. The wife has a 21" Samsung 223BW and her native resolution is set for 1680 X 1050.

Resolution settings are much more forgiving on the older CRT type monitors than the newer flat panels. I have noticed that if I set a flat panel for a resolution other than the native resolution they look lousy as in fuzzy with poor definition. Which brings us back to setting the resolution of a flat panel monitor isn't as much a matter of personal preference as much as I think it is a matter of native resolution for a specific monitor.

That would be my take anyway...
Ron
 
That's my take too Ron. My lappie looks best @ 1024 X 768. Any other setting gives really bad resolution.

Cheers
 
I'm using 1024X768 for a 19" SONY CRT G420 monitor ..
works great at the last 9 years ..

And my eyes love it too .
 
Last edited:
I run 1280 x 800 on my everyday laptop
The workshop machine runs two 19" 1280x1024 monitors in an extended desktop configuration (2560 x 1024)
The kiddies machine runs on a Dell 22" widescreen at something like 1600x1050
My media center runs on my 42" LCD at a native resolution of 1920x1080 (1080p)
 
I'm using dual 23 inch monitors at 1920 x 1080 on my desk. Fantastic amount of workspace for spreadsheeting, having multiple data sheets open beside a schematic editor, etc. It is getting a bit challenging for my eyesight though.
 
eric: in your post #7 you stated that you connect 2 computers via USB. I tried that but no comms between the 2, what is the trick to get them talking? Thanks, E
 
eric: in your post #7 you stated that you connect 2 computers via USB. I tried that but no comms between the 2, what is the trick to get them talking? Thanks, E

I would guess if Eric is using USB to network two computers he is using a cable as shown here. I don't know of any way to do it using for example a USB A to USB A cable.

Two computers can be easily networked using an ethernet cable and newer machines do not require a crossover ethernet cable. Most older systems require a crossover ethernet cable.

Ron
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top