1. Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
    Dismiss Notice

HARMONICS

Discussion in 'Mathematics and Physics' started by derick007, Jul 4, 2017.

  1. derick007

    derick007 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    89
    Likes:
    1
    Location:
    NORTHERN IRELAND, UK
    If a pure sine wave is put through a rectangular window (e.g. read into a spectrum analyser), it becomes distorted. This distortion can be observed by studying the frequency response.

    No longer is the spectrum just one fundamental frequency, but a number of harmonic frequencies which are generally thought of as multiples of the fundamental i.e.

    If f1 is the fundamental then the second harmonic, f2 = 2 * f1

    Third harmonic, f3 = 3 * f1 etc.

    However on closer inspection the harmonics are not exact multiples of the fundamental.

    Is there a method for selecting the frequencies of the harmonics ? I thought it was just a matter of looking at the spectrum and reading off the frequencies relating to the maximum amplitude ?

    But having used MATLAB / SIMULINK this is not the case. I started with a sine wave with a frequency of 498 Hz and read it into the spectrum analyser in SIMULINK with the following results :

    F1 = 564.138
    F2 =1118.55 = 1.98*F1
    F3 =1672.96 = 2.96*F1
    F4 =2227.37 = 3.95*F1
    F5 =2762.33 = 4.9*F1
    F6 =3307.02 = 5.86*F1

    Although the harmonics are not exact multiples of the fundamental, they are very close to it, but the strange thing is that the amplitudes at these frequencies are not the maximums apart from F1 and F4.

    If the frequencies at which the maximums occur were used then the following result would have been achieved :

    F1 =564.138

    F2 =1216 = 2.16*F1
    F3 =1731 = 3.07*F1
    F4 =2227 = 3.95*F1
    F5 =2733 = 4.84*F1
    F6 =3229 = 5.72*F1

    The frequencies here are less of a multiple than the first table above, but at least they occur at the maximum amplitudes, something that most people would understand recognise.

    The frequencies in the first table are closer to multiples of the fundamental, but only 2 of them occur (F1 and F4) at maximum amplitudes. Not sure how the other 4 frequencies / amplitudes are determined. Is it purely down to the individual person to decide on the frequency ? Surely not as these values are used to calculate other important performance parameters such as total harmonic distortion.

    Maybe the differences are so small they are considered negligible ?
     
  2. MikeMl

    MikeMl Well-Known Member Most Helpful Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,104
    Likes:
    563
    Location:
    AZ 86334
    Only on your spectrum analyzer...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. JimB

    JimB Super Moderator Most Helpful Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,359
    Likes:
    586
    Location:
    Peterhead, Scotland
    In the REAL world, rather than the computer game world of simulators, harmonics are an exact integer multiple of the fundamental frequency.

    JimB
     
  4. dave

    Dave New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 1997
    Messages:
    -
    Likes:
    0


     
  5. derick007

    derick007 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    89
    Likes:
    1
    Location:
    NORTHERN IRELAND, UK

    The thing is I have derived equations for the DFT and DTFT and used EXCEL to do the number crunching to compare with the simulator results - it turns out the EXCEL calcs are almost an exact copy of SIMULINK.
    EXCEL F1 = 560 Hz, Simulink F1 = 564 Hz.

    I have also come across literature on the internet which state than when a sinewave is distorted by the "windowing" effect of a spectrum analyser the resulting harmonics do not occur at exact multiples of the fundamental - see attachment.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. cowboybob

    cowboybob Well-Known Member Most Helpful Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Messages:
    3,039
    Likes:
    478
    Location:
    James Island, SC
    Ditto.

    What you're seeing is an anomaly of the DTFT analysis process. Fairly good exposition here.
     

Share This Page