I have received the sensor and done some tests.
I posted an update on the other forum but if i link it to here Nigel will ban me.
( let me just say i have no problems with the rules and if i had been politely advised that linking to other forums was not allowed, than the need for a RED notice could have been avoided, and for the record... no i was not warned before,..... as well it is not my site, i only help out with admin duties as many here do help with moderator duties)
Anyways.......... here is the update..........
I had done some tests on the pressure sensor on the bench here, and got some not exactly linear readings, the gauge used was unknown if it was true and correct.
So today i had a little time to visit a friend of mine who owns a hydraulic workshop, and use his test bench to run some better controlled tests.
Very happy with the results and got good linear readings across the full tested scale ( 0 to 3000psi) as the test bench was setup for a max of 3000psi the testing was limited to this, as to adjust the bench for higher pressures required some changes to be made and seen no point in needing to go higher, secondly i was a guest in the workshop and did not want to exceed the kind free use of the equipment.
With no pressure the display showed a reading (no recorded) this was zeroed with Tare.
The pressure was increased in steps of 250psi from a start point of 500psi, the gauge used was a large analog pressure gauge that allowed a little room for error, but close enough to prove the results.
The readings were rounder off.
Recorded results
500psi 5000 adc
750psi 7500 adc
1000psi 10000 adc
1250psi 12500 adc
1500psi 15100 adc
1750psi 17700 adc
2000psi 20500 adc
2250psi 23200 adc
2500psi 26000 adc
2750 psi 28100 adc
3000psi 31200 adc
The test was repeated several times with slight differences in readings, this was mainly due to the analog pressure gauge and the ability to align the needle with accuracy.
(or should i say the person controlling the pressure and the lack of understaning on need for accuracy, and a attitude of near enough is good enough)
A calibration factor was entered of 100:1 and the test repeated, the display showed corresponding readings to the pressure applied.
At a guess i am expecting 3000psi to be equal to a maximum weight of 5000 kg, and think the resolution of the readings should give reasonable display results within the 50kg range Paul had wanted.
Should anyone be interested the thread on the sensor is..... Square BSPP 1/4 inch.
Gerald had made several recommendations to the mounting of the sensor, as he had commented it is common for farmers to kill the sensors due to the hydraulic hammer effect applied to the sensors.
This is mainly due to operating equipment on rough ground with the bucket arms raised, and the hammering the hydraulics get from the arms bouncing up and down.
He recommends installing a ball valve under the sensor and shutting the oil flow off when the weight indicator is not required.
Also fitting the sensor on a small hose or tube and not directly into a large hose or tee fitting as this helps to dampen the shock effect.
And the last recommendation is to fit a gauge saver prior to the sensor or use a fitting that has been welded up and with a small weep hole for the oil to squeeze through, as this restricts the huge surge of oil to the sensor with hammering that destroys them.
All good advice i think.
Now it just a matter of Paul finishing his crop sowing and some spare time to install the system, then do some field testing to prove it all works within the equipment.
Pete.