georgekkkkk
Member
I think it has to be this one, working from 4X AA 1.5 volt cells?
Any faults with this circuit and reasons why it is doing strange things?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EVPs they talk more than I do, crystal clear.
I will show you.....
Here...let me show you.....
Now you will see for yourselves.
That post #21 circuit is not the circuit of the commercial light you now show in post #19: it's for a home built light.
The post #21 circuit is defective: there is nothing to limit the base current of Q2 to a safe value. Simulation shows Q2 base current and Q1 collector current is about 420mA. That's twice the rated current for Q1 and probably excessive for Q2 (I can't find data for its rated base current). It is therefore likely that both transistors will overheat and be damaged, so they might well behave erratically and cause the light to come on randomly or intermittently.
georgekkkkk replied:Apart from one question in post #13 (already answered), the only question you have been asked is for technical details of your detector! We're still waiting for those details.
I think it has to be this one, working from 4X AA 1.5 volt cells?
georgekkkk seems to be short of hard facts regarding the things which are under his control, ie his own (home made?) equipment.
All the other comments in his three of four posts just seem to me to be bluster and hyperbole.
I saw and heard nothing of any remarkable anything.
The girl talking about the preacher would have been giving off some degree of body language ques that would have conveyed her thoughts in near real time just a bit ahead of when the speech centers of her brain converted them to the needed muscle movements to speak the words.
If a person is familiar with someone else's body language plus can get a fair implied context of where their story is going it's not hard to make it look as is you are reading their mind by answering their questions with generalized plausible assumptions just ahead of when they speak them all based off of what their body language suggests their thoughts are most likely leading towards.
Odds are you're better at reading that persons basic undeveloped thought precursor (pre speech) body language than you are aware of hence why you than you can read minds.
Now if you tried it on someone like me who is aware of how this works you would fail every time and not only fail I could likely reverse things and appear to be reading your mind or even controlling it to a tiny degree!
Nothing unexplainable there to prove anything.
It's why people who have been around each other along time can often finish each other sentences or appear to even read each others thoughts. They are just very familiar with their thought patterns and micro movement body language without realizing it.
The girl talking about the preacher would have been giving off some degree of body language ques that would have conveyed her thoughts in near real time just a bit ahead of when the speech centers of her brain converted them to the needed muscle movements to speak the words.
Now if you tried it on someone like me who is aware of how this works you would fail every time and not only fail I could likely reverse things and appear to be reading your mind or even controlling it to a tiny degree!
Nothing unexplainable there to prove anything.
It's why people who have been around each other along time can often finish each other sentences or appear to even read each others thoughts. They are just very familiar with their thought patterns and micro movement body language without realizing it
You have slipped up there Tony!...lol
I am gonna have fun with you...I can do with cheering up.
Then please don't play with me, and challenge the reasoning why the Ghost Box works.Not really. Your about one pointless post from having this thread locked too.
Follow the pattern yet? I do and I don't need ESP to see it coming.
Oh....alec_t asked:
georgekkkkk replied:
JimB asks:
How is that circuit a detector of ANYTHING?
It is annotated as a "two mode night light".
There are no obvious detectors wired into the circuit.
I thought that there was a passive infra red detector in there somewhere, where is it?
georgekkkk seems to be short of hard facts regarding the things which are under his control, ie his own (home made?) equipment.
All the other comments in his three of four posts just seem to me to be bluster and hyperbole.
JimB
Then please don't play with me, and challenge the reasoning why the Ghost Box works.
I have guardian spirit guides to protect me.
All I am asking is the logistics towards the way you guys say that it works?
That post #21 circuit is not the circuit of the commercial light you now show in post #19: it's for a home built light.
The post #21 circuit is defective: there is nothing to limit the base current of Q2 to a safe value. Simulation shows Q2 base current and Q1 collector current is about 420mA. That's twice the rated current for Q1 and probably excessive for Q2 (I can't find data for its rated base current). It is therefore likely that both transistors will overheat and be damaged, so they might well behave erratically and cause the light to come on randomly or intermittently.
But we are not challenging why it works, Just the opposite. We are telling you why it does not work as you claim!
Feel free to send your spirit guard over here and give me proof of its existence. No proof here, no existence anywhere!
To what level of explanations do you need and can you actually understand? So far no one here has a clue how much you know about electronics other than apparently you see think things work a whole lot differently that reality shows them to work.
I can explain how my vacuum tube amplifier works to my cat buy that doesn't mean my cat follows how it works beyond it makes him warm.
Oh....
I am NOT a electronic engineer. Just a simple clairvoyant and ghost hunter who talks miracles that science is struggling.
In case this is not clear...you guys are like candy to the REAL world of pessimism, disbelief and debunk.
I have a fight out there and I am just picking your poisons so that I can eliminate certain factors of credible science.
This does not mean that I do not take 'on board what you are saying'?
Do I have to really prove myself in order to talk about a device that I am asking about logistics?
Okay..I could be faking...but I am not.
In order to progress, you will have to trust me and base your theories on what I am giving you.
Whether I believe your answers , is a matter of opinion.
Okay Tony.....it should NOT be working, yet it does.
Whatever proof YOU may need ...no one can provide because your mind has already been made up before I could even try?
Who is tony?
I'm tcmtech as far as you need to know here.
And you don't think that does not relate to you as well?
You can't follow the science behind things therefore they have to be supernatural despite the fact that multiple people have given you plausible explanations for your observations. Explanations that if given the chance many of us here could easily replicate and confirm.