LOL
There are too many people making spice models that have never applied power to the part.
Many data sheets don't really reveal how the part works.
You need to know how to read a data sheet.
Even the models from the maker often are not quite right.
"Not quite right?"
Some of the models were useless. The company doing the models were just programmers who didn't know what an oscilloscope was. We supplied them data and they made a model that spit out the numbers.
The last one I worked on was the LM2731. I had to take all the bench data they used to make the model. Then they claimed the model was "finished" and I start checking it and find out it doesn't agree with my data.
They claim my data must be wrong, because the model was right.
I say, then show me your data and let's figure out the difference.
They claim they have no data because their contract did not pay them to TEST the part, only develop a model.. If we want them to TEST, we have to pay them more money.
And National actually DID pay them more, to do what they needed to do to verify their model.
Bottom line, I eventually gave up and we threw out most of the model and developed a "guideline" for where the model data was accurate and where it was completely useless so I could advise customers what to use. I suspect most of the models are only accurate over a very narrow range of conditions but it's not my problem anymore.
But people still worship at the altar of the simulation and dinosaurs like me with bench data just let them.