Hi,
There are virtually no IC’s on the market that manage synchronous rectifier drive for isolated offline Two Transistor Forward Converters, or even for any other type of offline isolated converter. (eg Flyback, LLC, Full Bridge).
This is a very bad state of affairs. As such, we have designed our own discrete synchronous rectifier drive circuitry. This is as attached in the LTspice simulation and schematic.
All that’s basically needed is to invert and delay and trim the waveforms sufficiently to achieve the correct dead times between the respective gate drives, and of course, reverse overcurrent protection.
However , a microcontroller is needed, one on the primary and one on the secondary. The secondary one simply manages the reverse overcurrent latch.
The primary side microcontroller provides the 280ns signal delay that’s needed for the main gate drive signal from the PWM controller. This delay is essential and is part of getting the dead time for the synchronous rectifier gate drives.
I actually believe that a third small micro would be adviseable, on the secondary side, to replace the shown digital logic gates. Also, the 50ns delay block could in reality, only be done with a microcontroller.
There are a number of offtheshelf synchronous rectifier controllers available which have no connection to the primary side PWM controller…eg UCC24630…these are not useful, as they rely on detection of noisy switching nodes which may mean noise tripping and malfunction….after all, switching a synchronous rectifier on at the wrong time can be pretty catastrophic.
UCC24630
https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ucc24630.pdf
So would you agree that these kind of “Home-brew” synchronous rectifier controllers are the way forward?
Amongst other things, they use microcontrollers as “delay buffers”.
Attached is the LTspcie sim and schem of a Two transistor forward with sync rects, and our home-brew sync rect driver circuitry.
There are virtually no IC’s on the market that manage synchronous rectifier drive for isolated offline Two Transistor Forward Converters, or even for any other type of offline isolated converter. (eg Flyback, LLC, Full Bridge).
This is a very bad state of affairs. As such, we have designed our own discrete synchronous rectifier drive circuitry. This is as attached in the LTspice simulation and schematic.
All that’s basically needed is to invert and delay and trim the waveforms sufficiently to achieve the correct dead times between the respective gate drives, and of course, reverse overcurrent protection.
However , a microcontroller is needed, one on the primary and one on the secondary. The secondary one simply manages the reverse overcurrent latch.
The primary side microcontroller provides the 280ns signal delay that’s needed for the main gate drive signal from the PWM controller. This delay is essential and is part of getting the dead time for the synchronous rectifier gate drives.
I actually believe that a third small micro would be adviseable, on the secondary side, to replace the shown digital logic gates. Also, the 50ns delay block could in reality, only be done with a microcontroller.
There are a number of offtheshelf synchronous rectifier controllers available which have no connection to the primary side PWM controller…eg UCC24630…these are not useful, as they rely on detection of noisy switching nodes which may mean noise tripping and malfunction….after all, switching a synchronous rectifier on at the wrong time can be pretty catastrophic.
UCC24630
https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ucc24630.pdf
So would you agree that these kind of “Home-brew” synchronous rectifier controllers are the way forward?
Amongst other things, they use microcontrollers as “delay buffers”.
Attached is the LTspcie sim and schem of a Two transistor forward with sync rects, and our home-brew sync rect driver circuitry.