I am linking two micros via IR, one way only, thus repetition can not be asked to the emitter.
I am using the Sony's SIRC protocol. Speed is the same used for remote controls for domestic appliances.
Whatever is received altered should be discarded or corrected (?).
I've been reading a lot starting with parity check, checksum, Hamming code, FEC, SECDEC and more :shock:
My concern: what should be the balance between the small size of the message (one, eventually two packs with commands) and eventually robust but long and complex routines that could delay (?) a lot the process.
While I want to keep all simple, I also want it roubust enough.
It's just a robot but I want it running properly. Any rule of thumb :?:
Repeating the packs three or five times for majority voting, is it an option :?:
Changing the order and quantity of packs sent may be done any time but my problem is not there.
Sorry if I sound vague but have no previous experience.
Comments / suggestions anyone :idea: :?: Muchas gracias :!:
I am using the Sony's SIRC protocol. Speed is the same used for remote controls for domestic appliances.
Whatever is received altered should be discarded or corrected (?).
I've been reading a lot starting with parity check, checksum, Hamming code, FEC, SECDEC and more :shock:
My concern: what should be the balance between the small size of the message (one, eventually two packs with commands) and eventually robust but long and complex routines that could delay (?) a lot the process.
While I want to keep all simple, I also want it roubust enough.
It's just a robot but I want it running properly. Any rule of thumb :?:
Repeating the packs three or five times for majority voting, is it an option :?:
Changing the order and quantity of packs sent may be done any time but my problem is not there.
Sorry if I sound vague but have no previous experience.
Comments / suggestions anyone :idea: :?: Muchas gracias :!: