NY Times article said:Our cholesterol levels have been declining, and we have been smoking less, and yet the incidence of heart disease has not declined as would be expected. ''That is very disconcerting,'' Willett says. ''It suggests that something else bad is happening.''
Forget scientists if you want to learn about reducing bodyfat. They don't know crap.
Not to detract, I am slightly jealous, but I think of those guys like mack trucks with a juice box for a fuel tank. How long do you think they would last if they ran out of food? could they pass out & die if locked in an elevator for too long?
Pommie said:For all those who didn't read the article, the main point is, to feel satiated (full) on a low fat diet requires you to eat more calories than you would on a medium of high fat diet. So, no, a low fat diet dosn't make you fat but you'll probably get fat if you eat one.
Nothing is independent. All such organizations depend on funding, and as we all know from global warming, if you don't play along, you don't get funds. That is not meant to be a criticism of Swedish science. It is universal. For example, it is well know that the Framingham Heart Study was biased from its beginning.The switch in dietary advice followed the publication of a two-year study by the independent Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. The committee reviewed 16,000 studies published through May 31, 2013.
Nothing is independent. All such organizations depend on funding, and as we all know from global warming, if you don't play along, you don't get funds. That is not meant to be a criticism of Swedish science. It is universal. For example, it is well know that the Framingham Heart Study was biased from its beginning.
John
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?