Of course I can, with the conditions that the amp is very heavy and the music is by Frank Zappa.
Sorry, but I think you're talking complete rubbish
Despite the "Happy Face" in Nigel Goodwin's post, as you can see, a new member is trashed (no pun intended) by a Moderator and feels the need to apologize for a post that, best I can tell, was pure jest within the context of the thread.Sorry, I'm doing my best to fit in.
Nothing deleted, all here:Is it possible for me to see the entire "Thread" or has it been deleted?
Well, that is my point.That's ok, he trashes Old Timers with equal ferocity.
Well, that is my point.
Crude asides that denigrate rather than enlighten have no place in polite conversation.
My primary point is: why is it tolerated? Is Nigel too important to ETO?
Which leads me to ask: at what point in my membership may I, too, become rude, crude and spout inappropriate aspersions?
coyboybob said:Crude asides that denigrate rather than enlighten have no place in polite conversation.
moty22 said:Of course I can [provide scientific evidence], with the conditions that the amp is very heavy and the music is by Frank Zappa.
I don't like using emotions... I have now and again, but on the whole I don't..I suggest you try looking up the usage of emoticons, and there was nothing 'rude', crude, or inappropriate about my post - and if you consider my response was to something posted as 'jest' then that too should have used emoticons to signify it as such.
Putting a childish picture at the end of an impolite comment does not make it right . Just try to remain civil and on a level with your members.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?