Please improve this table.

[vlad777]

Languages:

-human lang <--> human mind
(Mandarin, Spanish, English...)
-programming lang <--> (bytecode)compiler/interpreter
(BASIC, Pascal, C++, Java, ASM)
-hardware def lang <--> fitter
(VHDL, Verilog, CUPL, ABEL)
-markup lang <--> renderer
(HTML, LaTeX)
-query lang <--> database engine
(SQL)
-DNA def lang <--> sequencer (Sci-Fi?)
(???)

 

[jpanhalt]

Not clear what you are trying to show with the table. Most tables show a relation of A to B to ??? What you have is simply a list. Is it meant to be sequential or something?

For example, not quite sure of what you mean by DNA and sequencer. One exists as an entity; the other is a process.

John

 

[vlad777]

Yes list, but it might become a table.

I heard that they took a single cell organism DNA, read it, and made a computer sequence it.
Synthetic DNA has then been put into empty cell, and this cell was shocked into life.

 

[jpanhalt]

That's mostly old news. What do you make of it or want to make of it?

John

BTW: Someone will want to know what you mean by being "shocked into life." That is, how do you distinguish that from simply inserting DNA or genes or a nucleus.

 

[vlad777]

First of all, did I make a mistake and can something be added?

(How did they call the software/hardware that did the sequencing?
But last item in this list is not most important. )

 

[jpanhalt]

As I tried to indicate, I have no idea what your list is trying to communicate. If the last item is not important, then what does the second item mean:

-programming lang <--> (bytecode)compiler/interpreter
(BASIC, Pascal, C++, Java, ASM)

John

 

[vlad777]

I thought it is apparent?
Actually this list could be a table with three columns:
first->type of language
second->the name of construct that makes sense of, or transforms the expressions
third-> example (only most popular)