HiTech said:Better take a closer look at modern day automobiles. Between advanced materials, and refined prinicples, they are far different than the old rumble seat clunkers our grandparents drove. And that doesn't include the heavy interface of electronics in them.
Pommie said:But they still use the same old internal combustion engine. Surely someone could have come up with something better in the last 125 years.
Mike.
Gaston said:it seems to that electric cars and nuclear power plants would be the way to go. and take the waste and send it on a rocket to the sun
dknguyen said:What fuels the rocket?
Because hydrogen from water is not a rpimary energy source and is very expensive to produce.Thunderchild said:oh and by the ay yes it seems scientists are nuts over getting hydrogen from petrolium rather than water I guess it has something to do with profits yet again
Thunderchild said:expand ? how do you mean ? I had a very reputable member of this board tell me out of his hat that we could never consider hydrogen as fuel by making it from eletrlysis because it was probably like 5-10 % efficient, well I checked and actually its 50-80 %.
Thunderchild said:ok so where can I start from ? I'd like to have many more sources of information but get fed up with looking through trashy adds all over the place
Thunderchild said:expand ? how do you mean ? I had a very reputable member of this board tell me out of his hat that we could never consider hydrogen as fuel by making it from eletrlysis because it was probably like 5-10 % efficient, well I checked and actually its 50-80 %.
dknguyen said:-better power sources (generation and batteries)
Gaston said:it seems to that electric cars and nuclear power plants would be the way to go. and take the waste and send it on a rocket to the sun
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?