Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

will this oscilloscope be enough?

Status
Not open for further replies.

patroclus

New Member
Hello!

I own an old second hand 20 MHz analog scope. It works fine, but it starts to show strange behaviors. I'm already saving money for a new one. I need it to be a digital scope, as most of my work is digital, and would really appreciate to capture non-periodical signals. A logic analyzer is just not enough for many tasks.

I'm considering to get a Tektronik TDS1001B. 2 channels, 40 MHz BW and 500 Ms/s real time, with 2.5k samples per channel, and very light and small. Black and white screen. This would already be quite expensive for my budget.

Going for a 60 MHz scope will raise the cost quite a bit more. There's the Tektronik model 60 MHz and 1Gs/s, and also others like the Agilent DSO3062A, which is much heavier and lacks of USB connection, but has a nice feature of rejecting the waves that go out of a predefined area. Also one from Gw-instek
https://www.electro-tech-online.com/custompdfs/2008/02/85367.pdf
which is in the prize range of the agilent, but 4 channels 100 MHz.

Going lower than the 40 MHz Tek, there's one from BK-precision
https://www.electro-tech-online.com/custompdfs/2008/02/105325.pdf
25 MHz and only 250 Ms/s, but much cheaper.
And others which lack of FFT feature and thus I reject.

I find quite interesting this one
**broken link removed**
200 Mhz, 2 channel, 1Gs/s, colour LCD and cheaper than the Tek... it seems too good to be true.

My main concern is, will the 40 MHz Tektronik model will be enough for general electronics ? I'm a little unexperienced in scopes, but as a digital electronic, 40 MHz seems like very low for me, and also 500 Ms/s real time sampling is not great. Well, what I like the most about Tektronik is that it seems a good company, and offers life time warranty, while the others just one year.

If you ask me what I want it for, I'd say, I want it for everything :)
Well, as much I can get from it, the better.
 
Last edited:
patroclus said:
Hello!

I own an old second hand 20 MHz analog scope. It works fine, but it starts to show strange behaviors. I'm already saving money for a new one. I need it to be a digital scope, as most of my work is digital, and would really appreciate to capture non-periodical signals.

You realize analog or digital, the way the scope works internally doesn't dictate whether or not you can use it for digital or analog applications?

I guess in the end you have to weight whether or not the cost of paying all that extra money to be able to view a digital signal in analog is worth it, or whether a much cheaper, faster logic analyzer will do.

That BK one is really cheap. $500! The only thing it is missing for me is a logic analyzer. I might have to drop my ultrasonic project just to buy it.

How much is that W2000? I would also reject one without an FFT.
 
Last edited:
I already own a USB logic analyzer 500 MHz and 34 channels, so I don't need another one by the moment. But I need to view signals, not only from digital circuits, but from some analog task as radio, TV, transistor amplifiers,... but I'm going into analog world in practical terms, and that is why I really don't know if it worths, as the specs are just numbers for me so far.
I've studied analog electronics, but only on paper :)
 
Well, to my understanding, analog requires lower bandwidth than digital, since to capture a 40MHz square wave properly you also need to capture it's harmonics (up to lat least 9th or 11th or something like that). While with a 40MHz RF thing, you only need to capture up to 40Mhz or maybe a few times that, but not up to the 11th.

THat W2000 is listed as being $1395 Euros...that's not exactly cheaper than the other scopes.

EDIT: After looking at them I would go with the Agilent DSO3062A. THat's the one I'm putting on my list. It costs just as much as the Tektronix 60MHz 1Gs but has a colour screen and seems more capable. BUt like you said, it's heavier, but I don't know what you mean by it having no USB, because it does.
 
Last edited:
Well, the tek 60 MHz is cheaper, at least here in Spain. I only see the lack of the Go-NoGo function compared with the agilent's. Of course, half the weight and half the space.
 
WHy are the Tek scopes half the size of the Agilent scopes? THat is kind of strange. THe tek has a Go-NoGo function. THey are two small buttons on the top right- they just aren't as large or as fancy (multi-coloured backlit) as the Agilent ones.
 
Last edited:
hi all
so how about pc base oscilloscope having same capabilities isn't they cheap
 
kep said:
hi all
so how about pc base oscilloscope having same capabilities isn't they cheap
I rules those out soley because it's so MUCH MUCH faster to have 10 fingers and two hands working the scope rather than a single mouse cursor.

The differences I can find are this:
-Running multiple channels reduces the sample rate of the Agilent Scope while the Tek ones claim to have the same sample rate regardless of the number of channels being run
-The Tek FFT has 2x as many sample points
-The Tek FFT has half the averaging resolution of the Agilent (Tek has 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 or 256 while the Agilent as 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, 32, 128, 256 or something like that)
-THe Agilent SEEMS to have a mode where it can acquire as soon as you push a button rather and completely ignoring the trigger altogether (unlike capturing a single trigger sequence by pusing a button.). It's a bit vague so I can't tell for sure.
-The Agilent has an adjustable variable BW digital filtering thing
-THe agilent can measure things like overshoot, duty cycle, and pulse width automatically.
-Both have a USB slave but only the Tek has a USB host (for flash drives).
-THe Agilent has a larger colour screen.

And though obviously biased, the Tektroniks videos comparing theirs and the Agilent scopes make some strong points if they are indeed true. I am leaning over to the Tektroniks. One thing is obvious, it's smaller! That bandwidth thing is a huge issue though, Tektroniks seems to say the Agilent scope only has a display of 500Ms, but if you check the scope curves carefull it shows the sampling rate is only half that (something about the Agilent scope being based off, if not a repackaged version of a scope from some company).
 
Last edited:
Have you tried checking out TekSelect at Tekstronics? You can get a TDS1002 (the 60MHz 1Gs scope) for $500 refurbished or a TDS1001B for the same price. Remember, that's a TDS1002, not the TDS1002B. I am not sure what the differences between the original and B models are though.

EDIT: From what I can find the only difference is the update in the communications port (ie. USB):
https://www.blii.com/tek/Tektronix_tds1000b_tds2000b_series_digital_storage_oscilloscopes.htm

Might be worth it...

MORE EDIT: You actually are in luck (not me though). It appears those oscilloscopes (apparently not refubrished just obsoleted due to the B model coming out) are only configured for Euro power in English or French languages (no North American power though so I'm outta luck).
 
Last edited:
Yes, but I don't want to buy overseas. I rather pay a bit more and get it here, because of possible faults or shipping damage (much faster, easier and cheaper to deal with a local store if the unit is faulty) and there're also the customs, etc...

It is just a very expensive item for me, and I like to be on the safe way ;-)

By the way, the model I can get here is the B. The other ones are not available. What I don't know yet, is if a monochrome LCD will be good enough, or if it worths the money going for colour. For 2 channels, it's not so important, just more confortable (for 4 channels I find colour almost essential).

Really, my old analogue scope has only one colour, the green beam :)
But these new models have so much functions inside that make colour desirable.

Are you sure about the go no go feature??
**broken link removed**

I don't see any button for that... and it is not advertised. I'm quite sure it lacks of it... that would be bad.
 
patroclus said:
Are you sure about the go no go feature??
**broken link removed**

I don't see any button for that... and it is not advertised. I'm quite sure it lacks of it... that would be bad.

If you are talking about the "Run/Stop" and "Single" buttons on the Agilent, they also exist on the Tek scopes. They are in the picture, and I went into my University's lab and checked.

What do you mean by Go-No-Go exaclty? You mean so it only captures the next trigger event? because that's what I am talking about.

patroclus said:
Yes, but I don't want to buy overseas. I rather pay a bit more and get it here, because of possible faults or shipping damage (much faster, easier and cheaper to deal with a local store if the unit is faulty) and there're also the customs, etc...
Are you sure it's overseas? Because it seems to imply certain refurbished models are located in different areas. You said you were from Spain? I would have though the TDS1000 units in the European inventory wouldnt be overseas for you.

patroclus said:
By the way, the model I can get here is the B. The other ones are not available. What I don't know yet, is if a monochrome LCD will be good enough, or if it worths the money going for colour. For 2 channels, it's not so important, just more confortable (for 4 channels I find colour almost essential).
Yeah, I too am wondering whether the extra $170 is worth it for a colour screen- it is only two lines after all and not 4.
 
Sorry, I might be confused. Maybe what I thought go no go was is not really. I think it's called mask.
What I was talking about is something you cam see in the first page of this datasheet.

https://www.electro-tech-online.com/custompdfs/2008/02/5989-2235EN.pdf

the top right image on top of the scope, where you can define a short of range around the wave, and if the capture wave "goes"
out that range / limit, then it detects it. I've seen it too in one of the cheap scopes I posted before. I think Tek doesn't offer it... I don't know if it's that great but it seems cool.
 
Last edited:
patroclus said:
Sorry, I might be confused. Maybe what I thought go no go was is not really. I think it's called mask.
What I was talking about is something you cam see in the first page of this datasheet.

https://www.electro-tech-online.com/custompdfs/2008/02/5989-2235EN-1.pdf

the top right image on top of the scope, where you can define a short of range around the wave, and if the capture wave "goes"
out that range / limit, then it detects it. I've seen it too in one of the cheap scopes I posted before. I think Tek doesn't offer it... I don't know if it's that great but it seems cool.

Oh, that is go-no-go. Yeah the Tek scopes don't seem to have that.
 
Anyway, it still seems like a pretty good choice. Tektronik has very good reputation here, and many people consider it one of the best companies for scopes. I really don't know, I just say what I heard.

I think I'd go for the black and white LCD, 2ch, 60 MHz, 1Gb/s.
The color LCD adds up 250 euro ( around $300 ) which is quite a lot. With that money I can get more tools.

For example, last year I bought an used 2MHz signal generator with plenty of features ( TTL, 50ohm and 600 ohm outputs, DC offset, amplitude, symmetry controls,...) for 150 euro, in good shape.
There're cheap basic USB logic analyzers for 250 euro, which if you have limited budget, and do a lot of digital electronics, it justs opens thousands of doors that otherwise wouldn't be open. Three years ago I got a 400 euro USB logic analyzer, and it's just great. Cheap, but very very useful.

Now, 250 euro for a color screen in a 2 ch scope, do you think it worths it?
I really would like to have one, and why not 4 ch, but I've got limited cash, so I need to choose, as always happens in engineering :)
With just an scope you can't do anything, it is just one tool. If you can get it for just $170, I would. But not for $300....
 
I've since decided to go with an updated Tektronix TDS1001B model. There is a FAQ on the Tek website about what is different between a TDS1000B/TDS2000B and a TDS1000/TDS2000 and one of them appears to be that the newer models have an extra knob used to set stuff and controls (kind of like a direction pad). It's B/W screen though with 40Mhz and 500Ms. BUt the warranty is 10 years or +5 years after obsolence.

If you get a non-B model the warranty is only 3 years (then again for a little cheaper than the same price you do get higher sampling rate and bandwidth and a colour screen).

I've used an Agilent mixed signal scope before wit the knob with this and I really liked it.

I would not get a colour screen for 250 euros- that is equal to like $350USD or $350 CAD. I am a bit confused because the euros is worth more than the US and Canadian dollar, but whenever you mention a price you always mention a number comparable (or greater) than the dollar when it should be less since it's worth more? SO if I take everything you are saying literally your prices are far more than mine. (FOr me, getting a colour screen on an obsolete model costs $170 more). At $170 it's either or for me.

I just wish the Tek scopes could measure duty cycle so you wouldn't have to calculate it yourself because lazy am I. (and higher bandwidth and sample rate with a colour screen and logic analyzer for less money is great too).

It's way to easy to need an oscilloscope with >200MHz bandwidth for measuring digital. I'd be hard-pressed to be working with an Analog signal that requires a bandwidth of more than 1MHz. The only signal that comes to mind that I would need more 100MHz bandwidth or more for is the clock signal on a processor. I'd need a 100MHz bandwidth to measure fastest sinusoid (80-100MHz) from an oscillator that a dsPIC can handle. If I wanted to measure a square wave at that frequency the bandwidth would be x5 at least. As soon as you start measuring square waves, you need way more bandwidth.

So yeah, it's kind of understandable that if you are used to working in digital, then a 40MHz scope might seem to be too low bandwidth, but it's quite high for analog -definately way higher than needed for audio, radio, and most sensor applications (the only thing it might be too slow for that immedately comes to mind is some kinds of RF).
 
Last edited:
Yeah I understand.
The 40 MHz scope will fit my budget. But going for 60 MHz adds 150 euros. Apart from the bandwidth, the sample rate doubles!
Are you sure you prefer the 40 MHz one?

:) About euros and dollars, I don't understand either. All electronics and other tech items cost the same in dollars than euros. Not the same value, the same number! That is, $600 = 600 euros. For example, videogame consoles. And our salaries are in euros not dollars! Well, in some areas things are not so great here.
 
patroclus said:
Yeah I understand.
The 40 MHz scope will fit my budget. But going for 60 MHz adds 150 euros. Apart from the bandwidth, the sample rate doubles!
Are you sure you prefer the 40 MHz one?

:) About euros and dollars, I don't understand either. All electronics and other tech items cost the same in dollars than euros. Not the same value, the same number! That is, $600 = 600 euros. For example, videogame consoles. And our salaries are in euros not dollars! Well, in some areas things are not so great here.

Well, the difference between 40MHz and 60Mhz is $300 for me (a bit more than $300 euros). Obviously I would prefer the 60MHz one, but it is another $300. And right now I only have $700 unless I get a job during "spring" break that's coming up 2 weeks from now. I dunno lol although it is only another $300 it is a ~33% increase in cost!
 
Last edited:
For 300 euros I WOULDN'T go for the 60 MHz neither :)
My choice is 688 euros or 831 euros. Less than 150 difference.... Now I don't know what to do! :-D
I suppose I'll think about it for some days, maybe weeks, till I see it clear, as this is something one have to choose right. Not everyday you buy these things
 
Oops I meant to say $300 is a bit more than $150 euros. Not 300 euros- that's ridiculous
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top