Signature Limits?

[theinfamousbob]

I've been thinking about this for a while - should the be a limit on image size in a signature?

I know mine is quite large, and I wanted to know if it was bothering people. I'd be more than happy to remove it.

Any thoughts?

-Infamous

 

[suicidalmonkey]

The height of a signature doesn't bother me.

It's only when the image is wider than the page and you need to scroll accross to see all the text that the signature annoys me.

 

[DigiTan]

I was just editing my own John Hancock minutes ago and thought the same thing.

When I go on dial-up in the summers, I have no problem loading large text sigs. It's just very large and animated images that cause bottlenecking.

 

[theinfamousbob]

It's only when the image is wider than the page and you need to scroll accross to see all the text that the signature annoys me.

Yea that annoys me as well.

It's just very large and animated images that cause bottlenecking.

that one annoys me a lot.

In lieu of this conversation, I think I'm going to take my X-Fire sig. off

It's not really relevant - Just one more image to load....

I'll find something suitable to replace it soon...

-Infamous

 

[lord loh.]

I use firefox and block images from those animated signature sites using the adlock extension.

Yes, animated signatures and picture signatures do eat my bandwidth. I do not mind large text signatures though.