Schematic with unmarked parts

O

OnionRingOfDoom

New Member

• Jul 22, 2006

• #21

Ok, thanks! I was planning on going to the library for just such a book this afternoon. Thanks for the advice, and thanks for tolerating my stupid questions

 

H

hjames

New Member

• Jul 22, 2006

• #22

Glad I could help - everyone is a beginner at some point, and the trick is to get the most knowledge with the least fried parts.

 

O

OnionRingOfDoom

New Member

• Jul 24, 2006

• #23

Here's the final schematic I redid, with all the grounds connected to the - side of the power supply. Does everything look correct?

 

Attachments

• sbv5_psupply.pdf

  27.4 KB · Views: 303

H

hjames

New Member

• Jul 24, 2006

• #24

I guess it's "right" - but I think you've just illustrated the reason why we tend to use symbols to indicate ground connections...

 

O

OnionRingOfDoom

New Member

• Jul 24, 2006

• #25

yeah, I know, but that was the only way the stupid simulation would work right...

 

H

hjames

New Member

• Jul 24, 2006

• #26

What's the name of the software? I'll put it on my list of things to avoid It would be *extremely* strange to find software which doesn't deal with ground properly though.

 

O

OnionRingOfDoom

New Member

• Jul 24, 2006

• #27

Multisim. Maybe I'm just not using it right. That's probabbly what it is.