Replacement for LM 2905 pin-to-pin

Status
Not open for further replies.

ramakap

New Member
LM2905 precision timer has gone out of production. I need to have a pin-to-pin replacement (preferably). Any other alternative is welcome.
 
Shame, it looked like a handy IC, better than the 555 in some respects. I wonder why preduction ceased.
 
For the same reason Cassette tapes took over 8 tracks
8 track was better sound but, Cassette was more popular.
Do we need to mention VHS vs Beta?
 
hotwaterwizard said:
For the same reason Cassette tapes took over 8 tracks

There were many reasons, but mostly:

1) 8 Track sounded crap!, better frequency response (due to running at twice the speed) but lousy wow and flutter.

2) Size - 8 Tracks were MUCH larger than casettes.

3) Reliability - 8 Tracks were very unreliable, and used to chew to pieces often.

4) Recording - people recorded their own cassettes, 8 Track recorders were extremely rare, as were blank tapes - plus you had the gap where they switched tracks.

There have been MANY different cassette formats, most very short lived (including the far higher quality Elcassette from Sony) - but the Philips Compact Cassette beat them all off!.
 
hotwaterwizard said:
Remember the old Pioneer Laser Disc the size of a record album?
They were the predecessor to CD's

Except it was Philips Laser Disc, not Pioneer. Hitachi also did a disc called CED (Capacitive Electronic Disc), and one of the other Jananese did one as well, was it JVC?.
 
hotwaterwizard said:
Nigel, it looks like you must argue everything.

Not arguing, just correcting false information (which helps no one), Philips created laser disk, and after it's failure used the same technology to create CD - with help from Sony, mostly on error correction.

Pioneer may have licenced Laser disk from Philips?, but Philips were the creators of it.

From Wikipedia:

 
Hero999 said:
Remember digital audio cassete?

The DCC from Philips, with the parallel multi-track head?, I've never actually seen one though!.

Remember mini disc?

They seem to have died off somewhat, but perhaps aren't completely dead yet?.
 
From the same site Pioneer was the first in the commercial market to sell the players!

The laserdisc (LD) was the first commercial optical disc storage medium, and was used primarily for the presentation of movies.

During its development, the format was referred to as the "Reflective Optical Videodisc System" before MCA, who owned the patent on the technology, renamed the format Disco-Vision in 1969. By the time the format was brought to market in 1978, the hyphen had been removed from the format name, and DiscoVision became the official name. Sales of DiscoVision players & discs began on December 15, 1978 starting in Atlanta, Georgia. MCA owned the rights to the largest catalog of films in the world during this time, and they directly manufactured and distributed the discs of their movies under the "MCA DiscoVision" label. Pioneer Electronics, who entered the market in 1978 at almost exactly the time DiscoVision titles were going on sale, began manufacturing
 
I wonder how much information one of thos dics could hold since they can't have used compression as computers weren't powerful enough back then.
 
Hero999 said:
I wonder how much information one of thos dics could hold since they can't have used compression as computers weren't powerful enough back then.

No, they weren't compressed at all, which is why they were so large - not forgetting of course that LP's were a similar size, and the leading edge of home audio at the time.
 
I wonder what resolution they used. I can't have seen them using full PAL resolution since a 90 miniute film with CD quality sound will take 65.65GB of storage space!
 
Hero999 said:
I wonder what resolution they used. I can't have seen them using full PAL resolution since a 90 miniute film with CD quality sound will take 65.65GB of storage space!

Never had anything to do with it, basiclaly it floped big time!.

But a quick google soon finds that the discs were analogue, and NOT digital, with each frame of video taking a single track around the disc, and the disk spining at a constant 1500 rpm, as opposed to the CLV of CD.

Discs for films were 55 minutes per side!.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…