I know I should walk away........But this is almost like a certain SF user thread!it is not free energy. it is not a pm. it is just a different view regarding a small simple generator homemade without electronic parts. it is project like linux where everybody can contribute with ideas to improve the small generator for educational purpose. wish to help us to go further?
He did ! In post # 5 in some detail .. .. .. .Ok start by telling us what you understand of your generator,
When did he say that ? It was JimB who raised the question of 'something special'you see the problem is you think this is a different type of generator,
He did that too ! .. .. .. .. .In a number of places .. .. ..Then tell us what you want to achieve,
He wanted to learn about the generator !where everybody can contribute with ideas to improve the small generator for educational purpose. wish to help us to go further?
.. .. .. .. but you'll do it anyway.Sorry if we seemed a bit harsh, I dunno yet if harsh is deserved or not
Hi MMHi LG
A few observations of my own .. .. .. .
He did ! In post # 5 in some detail .. .. .. .
When did he say that ? It was JimB who raised the question of 'something special'
He did that too ! .. .. .. .. .In a number of places .. .. ..
He wanted to learn about the generator !
.. .. .. .. but you'll do it anyway.
Speaking as another novice who probably understands less about small motor generators than this OP, I'll be surprised if this guy is foolish enough to come back again after all the mickey taking he's been offered so far.
Just a thought ..
Do you understand why?1. the angle between the coil and the rotating sphere it is a must - like in the presented video -otherwise the output voltage will be low
My suggestion is that you make something which is more like a conventional generator and compare the efficiency of the conventional generator against the efficiency of the generator which you show here."small generator 3" homemade project is looking forward for ideas to improve the small generator for educational purpose.
Yes, that's certainly true and also what makes ETO stand proud amongst the rest - I mean, be fair, it took 10 posts on ETO !In all honesty if anything I have said puts him off coming back, then he isnt going to last long on the net is he! 99% of Electronics forums out there would have ripped him to shreds for the first post.
Yes, that's certainly true also .. .. "Just pwm the motor and use the back emf to light the bulb..."At least I read what he replied and responded to it, more than most others did, including yourself.
My question still stands, what does he want to achieve? A better generator than exists, or has he something else in mind?? I know he wants to explore what he has observed, but that dosnt tell me what the end goal is. Is it just to explore principles?? And by the end of post five its more confusing, he mentions helping with it. WITH WHAT? What is he trying to develop? It isnt a more efficient generator, so it would help to know exactly what he sees as the end point.
So what does producing oxygen in 1774 have to do with the principles of electrical power generation today?In 1774, Priestley repeated Scheele’s experiments using a 12-inch-wide glass "burning lens", he focused sunlight on a lump of reddish mercuric oxide in an inverted glass container. The gas emitted, he found, was "five or six times as good as common air." (1) In succeeding tests, it caused a flame to burn intensely and kept a mouse alive about four times as long as a similar quantity of air.
A good principle to work from.Tell us your intended input power source specifications and what output you want and countless people here will tell you exactly how to achieve it and likely with far greater efficiency than you are doing it now.