Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Although they're quick, small and handy, logic probes are a lousy substitute for an oscilloscope. They have trouble with undefined logic levels, will often tell you that a point is LOW when it's really 0.5 volts (which is totally unacceptable) and may tell you if there's a pulse, but nothing about the pulse. I'm only mentioning all this to say that if a person were choosing to spend $100 or more on a high-end logic probe, he might instead consider putting that and a little more into a a used oscilloscope for not that much more.
And the simple fact that the voltage on the supply leads determine the logic level points that the probe will use to determine LOW, HIGH and undefined says that there's a heck of a lot of compromise going on there!
While I have used logic probes, 99% of the time I will use a scope, or if the situation requires or allows, one of my meters with min/max or state recording.
I have to agree with Dean, I mostly find logic probes not much better than an LED and a piece of wire. The most aggravating feature is the supposed "pulse" capture. I swear, a piezo lighter 5 feet away can trigger the pulse indicator. You spend more time clearing the pulse memory and guessing if a pulse really happened, than gaining any ground testing.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.