Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Logic Analyzer Suggestions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fred.Amoson

New Member
I am needing to get a logic analyzer for some of my projects. I've been looking around and these are my top picks:

Intronix LA1034 LogicPort - $389.00 - https://www.pctestinstruments.com/
-34 Channels
-500 MHz

Digiview Logic Analyzer - $499.00 - https://www.tech-tools.com/dv_main.htm
-18 Channel
-100 MHz

ANT8 - $224.00 - https://www.rockylogic.com/products/ant8.html
-8 Channels
-500 MHz

The Intronix says it has built-in interpreters for I2C, SPI and RS232 protocols. Could someone explain a little better what that does? I am familiar with all of the protocols, I just don't know what they mean about the built-in interpreters.

Those are my current top choices and I am leaning towards the Intronix. If you have any opinions over any of these, please let me know.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
A raw logic analyzer produces timing or state info.

With software they can provide a higher level view. In the case of RS232 instead of seeing the start, data, parity, and stop bits you would see the actual data transmitted as numbers and/or ascii.

When probing a micro you can use software to see traces processed by an inverse assembler. Given the right language package you can even see high level language statements included in the trace.

I have no experience with these affordable analyzers. They may include the tools so that you can even write code to post process you own traces. I feel this roll-your-own feature is more important then the ability to post process any given protocol.

EDIT: Having written the above it came to me that this may be way too much to ask of sub $1000 units.

Compare the speed in state and timing mode. Take a careful look at the triggering. It can make the diff between capturing what you need to see and not.
 
Last edited:
I have ANT8. Very good little bugger.
If you need to look at 3v3 systems too, then ANT16 is a better choice as ANT8 doesn't see very well below +4V. But it does to 40V ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top