Nice to study one such item. Thanks to Pasanlaksiri. I am reminded of a radio design by Siemens called "Radio receiver with component maximum"
Processor controlled Chargers are always welcome.
Any way, if the battery would have been Li-ion, it might call for tighter charge control and such complex controll would be purposeful..
But when these Ni-cd and Ni-Mh could be charged on Constant current basis and manage well- should we go for one such?
Nice to study one such item. Thanks to Pasanlaksiri. I am reminded of a radio design by Siemens called "Radio receiver with component maximum"
Processor controlled Chargers are always welcome.
Any way, if the battery would have been Li-ion, it might call for tighter charge control and such complex controll would be purposeful..
But when these Ni-cd and Ni-Mh could be charged on Constant current basis and manage well- should we go for one such?
No it's not a myth, NiCd's are rerally pretty poor things, mostly because of poor chargers - hopefully a well specified charger like above would extend NiCd life considerably.
As for mvs sarma
mvs sarma said:
But when these Ni-cd and Ni-Mh could be charged on Constant current basis and manage well- should we go for one such?
Presumably the design above uses constant current charging?, but doing so without dv/dt detection or over temperature detection, is just going to ruin the NiCd's.