Not to deter from electronics and sensing the conductivity of water to trigger pumps I would make another suggestion.
The problems with using plates in the water and conductivity is knowing the conductivity of the water, the plates corrode depending on the true chemical composition of the water and other things haunt you. Water with solids? Water with whatever?
About ten years ago I went to work one morning following a 4 day holiday weekend. We have a huge sump in a sub basement that holds about 4,000 liters of water and pretty much deionized water with some but few impurities. We were greeted by about 4 feet (over a meter) of water with al sorts of things floating around. Obviously the system failed.
I devised a new system and after looking at sensors I kept it simple. Real simple. I used float switches. We have two pumps down there. I put the pumps on a timer so each pump had the duty for 30 min. When the sump water reached a level a pump would come on based on which pump had the duty. However a pump could fail. When the water level increased another float sensor would trip. That sensor would command both pumps to run. In the event both pumps failed as the water rose a third float switch would kick in sounding an audible loud alarm. We run 24/7 so there is always someone there and in case of a holiday weekend which started this mess the system phones home.
I had originally kicked around fancy electronic sensors but the bottom line for my application was simple float switches, using 3 as I mentioned. The only actual electronics is the timer for pump duty, the rest is plain and simple relays and pump contactors. Simple is sometimes good and that system has been running 10 years, We replaced a few pumps but it works just fine.
Just My Take
Ron