I'm sure the originating site will remove the link once their bandwidth for the link increases dramatically.. unless it's cached.
I was attempting to get people's attention and speak sense, obviously, both the post and the image's intention failed. There is NO discussion occurring here, no debate, no information is exchanging just ego and chutzpah. Maybe a smidgen of somes abilities to use Google inappropriatly.
TCM, I didn't post an image. Just a link to an external sites image.
Are you referring to when you Googled the image for the STOP sign?I'm sure the originating site will remove the link once their bandwidth for the link increases dramatically.. unless it's cached.
I was attempting to get people's attention and speak sense, obviously, both the post and the image's intention failed. There is NO discussion occurring here, no debate, no information is exchanging just ego and chutzpah. Maybe a smidgen of somes abilities to use Google inappropriatly.
TCM, I didn't post an image. Just a link to an external sites image.
I heard this **broken link removed** on a local radio station. The person speaking is Professor Lindzen whose bio can be found **broken link removed**. I found the interview very enlightening.
Mike.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The very first person on this thread that accused someone else of not thinking of themselves was you, sir.
From your first post: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It's the brainwashed, lazy and unthinking that buys conspiracy theories based on stolen, trumped up and exaggerated misinformation."
There is no climate gate. The stuff being pimped was obtained by hacking a computer at the Climate Research Unit, cherry-picked, distorted and disseminated by conspiracy theorists. Much of the excerpts were taken out of context, for example, "hiding" doesn't mean deceptively withholding information, in scientific jargon. Rather, it referees to the not using data that may diverge for reasons other then the phonomena being discussed. Similarly "trick" is just a way to describe a method to deal with a difficult issue, not a way to deceive. In fact, none of these "revelations" are anything new, as the data has been available since 1998. {b}It's the brainwashed, lazy and unthinking that buys conspiracy theories based on stolen, trumped up and exaggerated misinformation. [/b] This is just one more illustration of how far the war on science will go and how deceptive, dishonest, duplicitous and capricious those who hate science are. When someone substitutes name calling for science, he's not making a scientific argument, he's trying to make a play on emotions. Not good for science, not good for anyone.
Simply put, as far as climate gate goes, there is no "there" there.
Oh, BTW I did find an alternate definition for "hide". Perhaps Phil Jones was speaking of animal skins?
The skin of an animal, especially the thick tough skin or pelt of a large animal.
tr.v. hid·ed, hid·ing, hides
To beat severely; flog.
Or perhaps he was referring to the flogging that he wished upon a skeptic in another e-mail.
(LOL, this is too funny as to be almost surreal.)
And yet you've utterly failed to explain how one hides something he freely publishes? What a surprise.
And please produce any e-mail where I wished flogging on anyone, or else please cease lying.
OK Either way, you both should refrain and comprehend that alternative opinions from your own are not always uninformed.
For anyone interested there was another **broken link removed** on the same radio station discussing the leaked emails.
Mike.
You should take your own advise.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?