Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Can 16F628A be programmed with JDM?

Status
Not open for further replies.
What is the difference between the A part and the non-A part, anyway?

I know they have some manufacturing differences, but functional-wise?
 
Yes, 16F628A can be programmed by JDM. A and non-A parts are almost the same (changes include: slower Timer1 oscilator, different config bits and some comparator issues are fixed). And all A parts are able to run @ 20Mhz (Non-A parts were marked with maximum frequency).
 
Jay.slovak said:
Yes, 16F628A can be programmed by JDM. A and non-A parts are almost the same (changes include: slower Timer1 oscilator, different config bits and some comparator issues are fixed). And all A parts are able to run @ 20Mhz (Non-A parts were marked with maximum frequency).

Why did microchip implement slower timer1?
 
MathGeek said:
Jay.slovak said:
Yes, 16F628A can be programmed by JDM. A and non-A parts are almost the same (changes include: slower Timer1 oscilator, different config bits and some comparator issues are fixed). And all A parts are able to run @ 20Mhz (Non-A parts were marked with maximum frequency).

Why did microchip implement slower timer1?

Presumably it's using technology from the later chips?, is the timer like this on all the newer ones?.

By the way, the 'A' simply means a later silicon revision, nothing else.
 
MathGeek said:
Jay.slovak said:
Yes, 16F628A can be programmed by JDM. A and non-A parts are almost the same (changes include: slower Timer1 oscilator, different config bits and some comparator issues are fixed). And all A parts are able to run @ 20Mhz (Non-A parts were marked with maximum frequency).

Why did microchip implement slower timer1?
I was writting that in hurry, and I ment that Timer1 oscilator (LP crystal connected to TIOSC pins) was able to run @ 200Khz, but in A version it can run @ 32KHz max. It is a result of different manufacturing technology.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top