So you're saying there is no right or wrong, yet the perspective that you've chosen to identify with is the only right one? Sounds like you want to have your cake, and eat it, too.
If you want to talk perspectives, this whole philosophy of entropy that's been bouncing around in popular science thinking has run its course. Its a doomed ideology that presumes the nature of things is limited to a very small set of rules. The belief in entropy, that all things will eventually become one, is itself an abstraction of traditional religions based on a single, unifying deity.
Part of my issue with the media, a politician, or CEO of a large company is the megalomania which drives them, psychopathically, with the idea that there can, eventually, be only one. It's such a limited, unsophisticated way of doing things that has lost all its charm to me. No one thing has yet been demonstrated to prevail, and in all instances I can think of where one thing has conquered another, several new things have appeared in the place of the victim. This whole idea that to succeed one has to conquer another, that companies have to beat each other for a victor, that the mightiest of robots must win in a battle of strength and agression, that video games have to be the figurative incarnation of destroying something else, must be surpassed.
There's got to be more to life than that. The thing that gives me hope is that someone will make a castle out of sand, momentarily lending structure and reason to something that was formerly entropic. You have to embrace your mortality, not resign yourself to it, and that's pure Shakespeare. Look at Macbeth - old Billy knew that a finite life in an infinite world mathematically amounts to zero, but you can't deny the importance of that flame that flickers, and somehow the shorter the flicker, the more precious it becomes.